|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 2nd, 2010, 09:52 AM
|
#16 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Of course if you do the zoom in camera in the DSP you can use the full pre-processing bit depth (I think it's 14 bit on the 350) before any compression artifacts are added and the bit depth reduced to 8 Bit.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2010, 04:50 AM
|
#17 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 565
|
Hi Doug,
I reviewd the footage thru vimeo , no-scaling, to do my guesses before I found your published results. Interestingly, me results are: You can see higher resolution on the optical ones, but if you didnt do the A/B in one screen it would be VERY hard to judge it. I found it more easy with texts (boatīs name etc.). I would love to see something similar in 1920x1080 (vimeo was 1280x720). From my trainings, optical was a clear winner in FullHD over the digital extender. But anyway, I am impressed how close both pictures compete to each other, especially if you have no A/B comparison... ULi |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
