|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 10th, 2010, 06:44 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
Remember that the 350 WITH kit lens is "only" $19k...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/657503-REG/Sony_PMW_350K_PMW_350K_XDCAM_EX_HD.html
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
April 10th, 2010, 06:48 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
I'm Confused
The link describes sensitivity of F12 and S/N 59db, yet if you open the .pdf brochure, that's only for the PMW350, the PMW320 retains the F10 and S/N 54db of the EX3.
...and moreover, the specs mention for both cams, image stabilizer, on/off selectable shift lens. My PMW350K doesn't have this. So is this a misprint, or has the feature been added? |
April 10th, 2010, 07:04 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ibadan, Nigeria
Posts: 103
|
Unconfirmed report mentioned a sony rep. saying the cameras will be ready by september
can any body confirm that |
April 10th, 2010, 07:06 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
Quote:
I don't know the difference between the K and L 350s but this one with no lens is nearly 18 grand. I still say 15k for body only is a good guess. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/657502-REG/Sony_PMW_350L_PMW_350L_XDCAM_EX_HD.html
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
|
April 10th, 2010, 07:09 PM | #20 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
The kit lens is cheap BUT pretty darned good for ESSENTIALLY a "free" lens... Saw the demo at a local Video retailer in December and was reasonably impressed. Will it kill a $40k lens? No but for $1500... it's a GREAT start to get people into a 2/3" world.
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
April 10th, 2010, 07:20 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 119
|
looks like this camera is very similar in sensitivity and low-light capabilities to the ex3. And if Barry Greene's tests are accurate, with the new Panasonic HPX370 tieing or even outperforming the EX3 in low-light, then things are going to be very interesting.
For me, having the awesome Panasonic color matrix feel (which feel more organic to me) and having 4:2:2 10-bit colorspace in the codec for a camera that will probably cost less than the PMW-320 and you have Panasonic with the better camera. Things have just again gotten very interesting. Last edited by Ed David; April 11th, 2010 at 11:29 AM. |
April 10th, 2010, 09:18 PM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fruitport
Posts: 28
|
New Sony EX Cameras
|
April 10th, 2010, 10:02 PM | #23 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Thanks Steve -- I've added the press release copy to the first post of this thread.
|
April 10th, 2010, 10:10 PM | #24 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
Quote:
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
|
April 10th, 2010, 10:25 PM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Read the original post carefully, you will see the prices posted. One config with a lens is MSRP at $14800. Sony is ALWAYS less in cost when the camera comes to market.
Something else to note on a POSITIVE side, the camera will have the "paint" controls of the PMW-350 as opposed to the EX1r/3. It will have the ins & outs of the 350, the switches of the 350 and the viewfinder of the 350. I think the audio is 48K 24 bit as well, not 16 bit but someone might want to verify that. Way too much bellyaching. |
April 10th, 2010, 10:28 PM | #26 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
Quote:
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
|
April 10th, 2010, 10:44 PM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Yes I see that now Shaun. Apologies to the bellyachers.
I see you have noticed the Panasonic juggernaut in Vancouver. I lived in Winnipeg as well. Sony had things wrapped up pretty tight there. I say "No" to the P2 card tax. |
April 11th, 2010, 01:33 AM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
So body only should be about 10k. That's a lot of camera. Better than I thought but my EX3 still looks like the right choice for me.
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
April 11th, 2010, 07:10 AM | #29 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
|
|
April 11th, 2010, 07:15 AM | #30 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
I've been told it's got an all new sensor block, not EX3 sensors, and has better than EX3 image quality. HDMI or SDi not both at same time, same as 350. I hope to play with one later today. PMW-320 has a blue hand grip. Unless the lenses have been changed there is no image stabilisation, don't know why it implies that there is in the PDF.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
| ||||||
|
|