December 29th, 2009, 05:41 AM | #121 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Two different cameras: PDW-F350 is optical disk, PMW-350 is solid state SxS. Tip o' the hat to Sony's naming department - 'thanks guys'.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
December 29th, 2009, 10:32 AM | #122 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
I don't understand Sony sometimes. Two cameras launched at a similar price point to the same market with such similar names. PMW-350 and PDW-F350, it's hardly surprising there is so much confusion.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
December 29th, 2009, 10:43 AM | #123 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Sony is just being careful to use up all the old numbers, not be caught without enough new ones. :)
|
December 29th, 2009, 11:05 AM | #124 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Well, even if they adopted a Dewey Decimal System, or a BMWesque sort of moniker, at least it could have been the 370 series, or the 330. I really can't work out why it isn't an EX-7.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
December 29th, 2009, 11:57 AM | #125 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
Does anyone know if the PMW 350 viewfinder underscans?
__________________
www.mikemarriage.com |
December 29th, 2009, 12:08 PM | #126 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Not sure Mike but I will know tomorrow when mine arrives. I am sure Alister knows and might even have it is his review.
|
December 29th, 2009, 02:12 PM | #127 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Yes and No, the 350 VF underscans in the same way that the EX3 VF underscans. So while it shows much more in the VF than you should see on a normal TV there are a few pixels at the edges that are not visible.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
December 29th, 2009, 03:50 PM | #128 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 29
|
A question for Alistair
Please tell me if the PMW350 stock lens has the jerky slow zoom issues common to the EX1 and EX3. Would I have to buy a proper lens to get smooth, feathered stops and starts? Many thanks for any reply.
|
December 29th, 2009, 03:52 PM | #129 |
Telecam Films
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 723
|
BMW actually did a similarely odd thing by naming their new 650GS bike the F650GS and that new bike actually has a 800 engine... In regard to the PMW350, yes. There is going to be a lots of confusion on the consumers and crew bookers side. PMW-EX5 or PDW-F400 would have been a much more logical choice.
|
December 29th, 2009, 04:11 PM | #130 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Dave I think the answer is yes you will have to also buy a nice 2/3" HD lens for the 350. There have not been too many who have tested the stock lens. I will be doing that tomorrow on my camera but I have received word that it has the same jerky slow zoom issues. I will confirm this tomorrow.
But it is to be expected with a $2000 HD lens. Nice glass be it wide or long with a Nano hooked up will make this camera shine. |
December 29th, 2009, 05:32 PM | #131 |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,442
|
It's a shoulder mount, so therefore it needed three numerals.
I don't see why it wasn't called the PMW-400, but I think the Japanese have some kind of superstition about certain numbers.
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
December 30th, 2009, 04:30 AM | #132 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
What? I expect a professional lens to work! The jerky zoom is a major issue on the EX3 - smooth zooms are essential for almost all documentary work.
I can accept that a $2,000 lens may not look as good as a $20,000 lens but it is pretty basic to make it zoom smoothly. I've never seen the issue on any lens/camera besides the EX1/3 and really cheap consumer grade kit. It is totally unacceptable on a camera/lens at this level.
__________________
www.mikemarriage.com |
December 30th, 2009, 06:41 AM | #133 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Mike Sony has a options for you buy the camera with out a lens and buy a 2/3" lens of your choice. Also don't jump to conclusions until the new 350 lens is fully tested. I am only trying to give you information here.
|
December 30th, 2009, 07:06 AM | #134 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
Sorry, probably my irritation bubbling over from finding this fault in the EX3. I really hope they have sorted it for the PMW350 as initial reports suggest the lens is optically surprisingly good it would be a real shame if it was let down but a jerky zoom.
__________________
www.mikemarriage.com |
December 30th, 2009, 07:29 AM | #135 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
No worry Mike,
Currently I am charging the batteries for my PMW-350 since it arrived. I will let you know my thoughts on the stock lens soon. Last edited by Paul Cronin; December 30th, 2009 at 09:45 AM. |
| ||||||
|
|