Problem's with PDW-F350 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony ENG / EFP Shoulder Mounts
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Sony ENG / EFP Shoulder Mounts
Sony PDW-F800, PDW-700, PDW-850, PXW-X500 (XDCAM HD) and PMW-400, PMW-320 (XDCAM EX).

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 16th, 2008, 04:36 AM   #1
New Boot
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy - Rome
Posts: 13
Problem's with PDW-F350

My sealers has given to me one used Xdcam F350 for test.

This camera for my is dedicated for news and wedding.

Last weekend i have try this camera with standard paint setting and customs paint setting from "http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/sony-xdcam-hd-cinealta/124332-pdw-f-series-favourite-settings.html" and the result's is very very bad quality.

The image have a yellow tint in outdoor (also in WB manual) and the backlight is very very poor, the highlight or lowlight (various exposure) is lose.
Alessandro Pinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2008, 05:48 AM   #3
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Colours look correct to me. Looks like you are over exposing. You should try using the standard camera settings but with just Cinegamma 4. That should give you some extra lattitude.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2008, 07:05 AM   #4
New Boot
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 17
Alessandro,

which settings are you using from the posting you mention?

Like Alister said, try to use Cinegamma 4, it is much nicer on the highlights.

This morning I did some tests with Cinegamma 4 and the standard gamma. I've attached 2 pictures made with both settings. You can see the difference in how the highlights are handled nicer on the Cinegamma 4 setting (left picture). Look at the roof of the house in the background.

These are my settings for CineGamma 4:

MATRIX 1

USER MATRIX: ON
USER MATRIX SAT: 0
USER MATRIX HUE: +3
PRESET MATRIX: ON
PRESET MATRIX SEL: STD

LOW KEY SAT LEVEL: 6

MATRIX 2

User matrix R-G: +16
User matrix R-B: +6
User matrix G-R: +2
User matrix G-B: +17
User matrix B-R: +6
User matrix B-G: +4

shot in 1080 50i 35Mb HQ
Attached Thumbnails
Problem's with PDW-F350-cinetestsbuitencine4hue-3_1280x720.jpg   Problem's with PDW-F350-cinetestsbuitenfofic1280x720.jpg  

Richard Raaijmakers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2008, 07:52 AM   #5
New Boot
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy - Rome
Posts: 13
Hi Richard, i use your settings for this shot.

Your's two sample image is very similar to my image but for me is too yellow :(

With cine gamma 4 is better on the highlight's
Alessandro Pinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2008, 11:20 AM   #6
New Boot
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 17
Well, color is a very subjective thing.

You could start with Cine gamma 4, all the other paint settings at default and try a preset matrix. See if you like it. I would not try to setup the user matrix if you don't have the equipment to judge the picture correctly. My camera was initially setup by a professional engineer with all the techical intruments to judge the picture. This is now my reference scene file.
With the standard gamma I noticed some abrupt highlight clipping when you overexpose a bit, specially in peoples faces. with cine gamma 4 the highlights are more gradually clipped.


Richard
Richard Raaijmakers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 17th, 2008, 04:17 AM   #7
Trustee
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
Alessandro, we need to know how you are monitoring the image and how you have set your monitor up to eliminate any possibility that the yellow tint isn't being caused by your viewing equipment.
Simon Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 17th, 2008, 10:00 AM   #8
New Boot
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy - Rome
Posts: 13
i monitoring with a Sony LMD-9050 or LMD-2450W in HD-SDI perfectly calibrated.

Tomorrow post some test make today on the beach with HDW-750P (1st camera on the set) and PDW-F350 (2nd camera on the set for backstage).

I don't want all resolution or dinamic range of HDW-750P to PDW-F350, i want only the just colorimetry.
Alessandro Pinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2008, 05:06 AM   #9
New Boot
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy - Rome
Posts: 13
Ok.

Another test, this colors of beach is correct for you?

Shot with PDW-F350

http://img27.picoodle.com/data/img27...1m_b743f15.jpg

http://img32.picoodle.com/data/img32...2m_f375352.jpg

This is some image shot with HDW-750P

http://img32.picoodle.com/data/img32...1m_73ade03.jpg

http://img37.picoodle.com/data/img37...2m_bf6095e.jpg
Alessandro Pinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2008, 06:05 AM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
For a start the F350 is well over exposed pushing the whites well into clipping which in turn is leading to a lot of Knee Saturation correction. Stopping down a little will help. The grabs also look noisy, what is the gain set to? 0db gives best lattitude, -3db gives lowest noise.

How are you white balancing, I've seen similar colour casts due to using bleached paper that is in fact slightly blue.

I would do a full reset on the camera to ensure that all the Paint settings are back to the default as those image look to have some Gamma and matrix tweeks. Then I would just try stock settings with the exception of using Cinegamma 4. Normally the colorimetry between a stock F350 and stock 750 is very close. You might also want to turn down the detail correction, try -10 it will help with the black lines around the high contrast areas. There is something not right about the way that F350 is set up.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2008, 06:20 AM   #11
New Boot
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy - Rome
Posts: 13
Hi Alister,

The WB is set-up on grey paper 18% (6300°k 750, 5100°k 350)

before try setting's of Richard i have reset all system camera to default.

The gain is 0db.

is possible a problem of lens? in the F350 is mounted a SD broadcast Canon Lens 1/2".
Alessandro Pinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2008, 07:26 AM   #12
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Looking at your frame grabs the whites are not white. Usual causes are incorrect white balancing, off-set white setting or matrix settings. I doubt it's the lens more likely camera setup.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2008, 07:56 PM   #13
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DFW area, TX
Posts: 6,117
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alister Chapman View Post
Looking at your frame grabs the whites are not white. Usual causes are incorrect white balancing, off-set white setting or matrix settings. I doubt it's the lens more likely camera setup.
I was thinking that someone might have placed a WB offset into the camera. With adequate monitoring on set, it seems they should be able to paint the 350 very close to the 750.

-gb-
Greg Boston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19th, 2008, 12:45 AM   #14
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 565
Yes, definetely make a full reset and start from scratch.

Can you set up HDCAM and XD HD next to each other with a colour chart (or some reproducable colors) to make an A/B comparison?

In the first stills you posted there were lot of CA. My "standard" lens is a Canon YH12x4.8 WA. Though it makes CA under certain conditions, it seems much heavier in your pics.
I also own an old Canon YH18x6.7 that makes the pic really bad... so I dont use it anymore.

ULI
Uli Mors is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony ENG / EFP Shoulder Mounts


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network