|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 18th, 2015, 03:17 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 120
|
Amsterdam
Two short films shot in Amsterdam.
|
March 18th, 2015, 03:20 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 120
|
Re: Amsterdam
Last edited by Kevin Langdon; March 18th, 2015 at 03:26 PM. Reason: Mistake made |
March 18th, 2015, 03:21 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 120
|
Re: Amsterdam
|
March 19th, 2015, 01:45 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Veenendaal, Holland
Posts: 225
|
Re: Amsterdam
Adding some more hidden places.
|
March 19th, 2015, 10:14 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 141
|
Re: Amsterdam
Kevin - are you sure that the upload is okay? Your videos looks very unsharp and extremelly compressed.
|
March 19th, 2015, 11:22 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 120
|
Re: Amsterdam
They look OK played on my laptop in the UK...
|
March 19th, 2015, 01:33 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 141
|
Re: Amsterdam
Hmmm. Look at this. Where are the details?
What lenses did you use? It looks, like the left size of the picture use to be softened by wide angle. I added just a little saturation to the night scene - to show how much noise and compression artefacts are there. Maybe is you output editing format too compressed? Colors are very on the "warmish" side. On the attached pic i did just correct colors to make the snow white - an i think it makes a big difference. A7s delivers so much sharpness and details - i do not understand why not on your films. |
March 19th, 2015, 02:44 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 120
|
Re: Amsterdam
Thanks for your comments. I agree the night time pix do have more noise than I would like. I haven't really found a setting which has barely any at night. Out of the 3 shots at the ice rink the other two have whiter ice. I'm not sure why there's a difference as they were filmed within a few minutes of each other.
I've been using a setting from another forum that has found favour with others. I'll have another look. |
March 23rd, 2015, 02:28 PM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Re: Amsterdam
They look soft and noisy for me too. Are you shooting XAVC or one of the other codecs?
|
March 23rd, 2015, 05:29 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep South, U.S.
Posts: 1,526
|
Re: Amsterdam
The footage looks soft to me also. If it looks good on you timeline it might be how you encoded it (codec and bitrate) for Vimeo upload.
__________________
Mark videos: http://vimeo.com/channels/3523 Stock: http://www.pond5.com/artist/mark29 Last edited by Mark Williams; March 23rd, 2015 at 08:44 PM. |
March 24th, 2015, 09:58 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 120
|
Re: Amsterdam
XAVC and I uploaded to You Tube at 1080 at the supposed better quality setting rather than faster encode.
I've been having a problem or two with my laptop, so I think the two things may be connected... |
| ||||||
|
|