|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Diego, Califonia
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Low light sidekick for PWW-X70
Some A7sII footage shot like a year ago by me in the field...it kills the A7II...the giant pixels are specialized for low light. Maybe pop an SELP18200 PZ on the little guy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 85
|
Re: Low light sidekick for PWW-X70
If we are speaking about comparable sensor technologies, that should be the case (α6000 vs α7).
A full frame sensor is approximately double the area of an APS/Super35 sensor, so if the α6000 and the α7 ii have similar resolution, the α7 ii should give you another stop of room. A problem with the α7 is the cost of full frame lenses in e mount, and the small capacity of batteries. Because mirrorless cameras have their screen active all the time, their batteries don't last much - you will probably need extra batteries, maybe a booster grip with two batteries, which helps also balance front-heavy lenses. Of course, the α7S is the champion of low light due to its low resolution. Hope this helps, N.F. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 85
|
Re: Low light sidekick for PWW-X70
Quote:
You would have to use a 24-70 or a 70-200 full frame lens for good results. N.F. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tepetlaoxtoc MX
Posts: 37
|
Re: Low light sidekick for PWW-X70
thanks for your input... looks like time to start looking for A7S or A7SII
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|