|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 10th, 2015, 12:11 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Yeah, I know - VLC plays them back just fine, but one wants to edit, right?
Heck - Catalyst Browse plays them full speed!
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
June 10th, 2015, 12:16 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 495
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Since they did not include the card structure, just the files, FCPX would not import these, but EditReady easily converted them to ProRes. Threw one into a 1080p timeline - played back easily even before rendering was finished. The ProRes plays back and edits beautifully, however I do have a 6TB Thunderbolt raid 0 on my 27" iMac.
|
June 10th, 2015, 03:14 PM | #18 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,197
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Quote:
|
|
June 10th, 2015, 03:36 PM | #19 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Quote:
Ron Evans |
|
June 10th, 2015, 09:49 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 52
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Bought from official sony reseller in my region. It is little box with code, over sony webpage got license file based on s/n of camcorder.
Last edited by Zenes Petrusin; June 11th, 2015 at 12:06 AM. |
June 11th, 2015, 04:34 AM | #21 |
Tourist
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Mt. Juliet, Tennessee
Posts: 1
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
|
June 11th, 2015, 08:30 AM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stocksfield, England
Posts: 86
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Hi guys,
Maybe Piotr will need a faster cpu for this camera format? I was considering this camera, so tried the first clip here. (thanks Zenes). I use Edius and my old i7-920 machine played the clip without stutters or frame drops but scrubbing was not smooth. This tells me what I already knew, that my old machine is out of it's depth with 4K. I had the same problem with 4K mov files from my GH4 so it's par for the course and I now have an i7-5960X machine. With the new computer I found that in a 4K project Edius 7 can plays 3 streams of the MXF file consistently, without frame drops, scrubbing is smooth and precise. While playing, Win 7 task manager reports 16 logical cores at 45 - 95%. Since I deliver 4K as HD I put the same clip four times into a 25p HD project, where for some odd reason Edius handled it even better! 4 streams, 16 logical cores at 91 - 98%. Not tried adding filters yet but so far the camera format seems very editable, certainly no need to transcode, just need some power and a willing NLE... so just asking myself do I want the camera...
__________________
Claire |
June 11th, 2015, 09:15 AM | #23 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,197
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
|
June 11th, 2015, 10:30 AM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 52
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Maybe tomorow upload some more. Download server use SSL, has some certificate, try check correct time and date on your computer or use new web browser version, in this reasons is maybe some warning or errors on your side.
|
June 12th, 2015, 02:34 AM | #25 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Zenes,
I tested your clips again on my friends super-fast computer and a 50" plasma HDTV (not UHD) and I must say something is terribly wrong with the quality - as if the clips were interlaced or something; there is a lot of jerkiness in panning and jagged lines. If that is the final quality of the troublesome X70 4k XAVC-L codec - the camera is seriously flawed... PS. I can see the same artefacts in VLC, so it's not Vegas fault this time.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
June 12th, 2015, 03:07 AM | #26 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
|
June 12th, 2015, 04:13 AM | #27 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Oh, and one more thing:
When comparing all these new 4k cameras using Vegas or other NLE, we must remember that not all of them (or their codex) have been made equal - and when something doesn't work (or works worse than the rest of the bunch), it's not always Vegas Pro's fault. As I have stated, 4k from the AX1/AX100 cameras plays back stunningly, with this "out-of-the-window" wow look. But I forgot about one more camera that also plays absolutely wonderful in Vegas: the JVC GY-HM200. Even though the native samples I have are in the dreaded MOV wrapper, they play full speed at Best/Full and the picture is amazing. Oh, and the 4k codec is 8 bit 420, but not overly compressed at 150 Mbps (the fps is 30p). Those clips play Best/Full even on my lousy laptop! If only the sensor was a tad bigger and better in low light... Piotr
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
June 12th, 2015, 06:54 AM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Shepparton, Vic, Australia
Posts: 78
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Thanks for providing the clips so I can test if my computer can handle them before getting into 4k.
I have been able to download the 3 mxf clips, import them into Premiere Pro CC and put them together on a 1080p and 3840p timelines. I've zoomed and split and sometimes the playback is a bit jerky, but that is because I am running out of RAM. I tried a 3 clip multicam 4k sequence, but CPU bounced around 100% and RAM maxed out. I don't know how I would go at 50p. More RAM is next on the shopping list. My computer is a DELL Vostro 470 i7-3770 3.4GHz 8GB RAM NVIDIA GTX-660 1920 x 1080 monitor Windows 7 Pro 64 bit |
June 12th, 2015, 09:36 AM | #29 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 52
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Quote:
|
|
June 12th, 2015, 09:50 AM | #30 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: 60Mbp/s vs. 100Mbps - Supprising Video Samples
Quote:
In fact, 1080/25p material from EX1 or FS100 looks better than the 4k in the clips you provided - I hope Sony will issue yet another X70 firmware iteration soon to take care of these XAVC-L motion artefacts in 4k...
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
| ||||||
|
|