|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 21st, 2015, 04:05 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
Re: xavc vs avchd
Coming from experience with the AX100, RX10, and a little with the RX100M3....
I shot several test scenes with the AX100 when I got it, AVCHD, XAVCS, and also 1920x1080 vs. 4K. I would not shoot AVCHD again, but that's just an opinion. I also shot a multicam with AX100, 2x RX10's, the fast card I ordered for the second RX10 didn't arrive in time, so that cam had to stay in AVCHD mode - I can use the footage from the camera, and I venture that most viewers wouldn't notice when all is said and done. Looking at it while editing makes me sad. Again, I would not even think about shooting lower bitrate AVCHD ever again if I had the choice. That said, I've shot plenty of nice looking stuff with AVCHD along the way (usually highest bitrate 60p) and "it'll do", but just as many of my older photos look "dated" now I'm using a 4K screen to view them, and the "little flaws" that weren't big before now jump off the screen, I wouldn't want to shoot in a format that will not look good in a few years, if I can shoot in one that is more likely to still look "current". Just my take on it, and BTW, Vegas chomps through XAVCS just fine here, eagerly awaiting the new firmware for 100Mbps that is rumored! OK, had to build a hot rod editing platform, but it was not overly expensive to update a machine that was already overdue! |
February 21st, 2015, 06:17 PM | #17 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: xavc vs avchd
Quote:
Ron Evans |
|
| ||||||
|
|