|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 19th, 2014, 09:18 AM | #511 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Like you I can't seem to do anything useful with this. Back to Prepare. What on earth are the developers in Sony doing? do they live on another planet?
__________________
Mike Last edited by Mike Griffiths; December 19th, 2014 at 09:18 AM. Reason: grammar |
December 19th, 2014, 09:32 AM | #512 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
OK so I'm stupid but when I select several file to transcode, the transcode button is greyed out. Back to square one. What am I doing wrong?
__________________
Mike |
December 19th, 2014, 10:47 AM | #513 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Diego, Califonia
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
You are operating a camera with a codec that will not be editable until so much time passes that the cost of the camera drops several hundred dollars, and is replaced with a NEWER UNIT WITH BETTER HARDWARE FEATURES. :-)
Paul |
December 19th, 2014, 11:07 AM | #514 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Catalyst Prepare is $199 at the Sony site but I was able to purchase it for about $50 less from B&H. I don't have an X70 (yet) but do have a new Sony A7s.
|
December 19th, 2014, 11:20 AM | #515 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Diego, Califonia
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Just confirmed I can only transcode to AVCHD or DPX on my PC as well. DPX doesn't work in Sony Vegas either, and this is not a multiclip issue, Catalyst Browse refuses to transcode even a single file to anything other than AVCHD or DPX. This free Sony software appears to be a "Whoops, I accidentally shot this on a format that is not editable, and need to transcode to the other format that I should have selected in my camera menu" solution. They should just call this "SD Card Footage Repair" Browse.
This means there is still no way to get my 10 bit 4:2:2 50Mbps video out of my camera........how annoying. Paul |
December 19th, 2014, 12:22 PM | #516 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 62
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Why not use Premiere Pro? It will run with XAVC right out of the camera, or transcode to whatever you like. Get a free demo or sign up for a Creative Cloud subscription. Cheaper than an external ProRes recorder...
|
December 19th, 2014, 12:31 PM | #517 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Quote:
Ron Evans |
|
December 19th, 2014, 06:10 PM | #518 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 495
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
I don't know what to say - mine works.
In the Browse View in Catalyst Browse I can select multiple clips and transcode them to ProRes. Select them, click the File dropdown at lower right. Choose Transcode to... Set Format to ProRes Choose preset you want. |
December 19th, 2014, 06:17 PM | #519 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
My only choices are DPX and XAVC no ProRes I am on Windows though. Trans coding to XAVC Intra will then work in Vegas 12.
Ron Evans |
December 19th, 2014, 06:29 PM | #520 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 495
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
I'm on Mac - latest version of Browse (1.1.0.86 from earlier this week) and latest OSX.
|
December 19th, 2014, 07:49 PM | #521 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Windows version is (1.1.0.87) with DPX or XAVC as options
|
December 19th, 2014, 08:08 PM | #522 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Quote:
__________________
Mike |
|
December 19th, 2014, 08:12 PM | #523 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Quote:
It's like being in a computer game maze.
__________________
Mike |
|
December 19th, 2014, 10:20 PM | #524 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Paul as I mentioned the transcode to XAVC Intra will work in Vegas 12 so you can edit your X70 video. Transcode is quite fast too. XAVC Intra is the full version of XAVC rather than the LongGOP of the X70 so file size is bigger about 5 times as big !!! But is easier to edit with. OF interest too is the fact i could not get the data code button on the X70 I had as a demo to work but this latest version of Catalyst shows all the data code information !!!
Ron Evans |
December 20th, 2014, 02:12 PM | #525 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Diego, Califonia
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Just figured out that part of my problem is that I shoot 720p60. In a test, 1080p60 WILL transcode to ProRes and XAVC. This is still a problem for me, as my work issued editing platform is FCP X, and if you use FCP X, you will no doubt be aware that you cannot export/render/share a 720 file from a 1080 master unless you do something like drop a 1 second 720 clip at the beginning of the timeline.
I must say though, I did nee a noticeable improvement in quality on the XAVC footage I ingested via SDI. The night gained up colorful stuff looked smoother, less noise, colors popped a bit more. :) Paul |
| ||||||
|
|