|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 29th, 2014, 11:04 PM | #271 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Sony Catalyst is available! a bit strange but it does work for the X70
__________________
Mike |
September 30th, 2014, 06:53 AM | #272 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
I agree, but have you seen the Sony promo where they are blowing glass? that will blow your mind
__________________
Mike |
September 30th, 2014, 06:55 AM | #273 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Posts: 152
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Thanks everyone for the comments on IR. I'm new to Sony, having used Panny cameras for several years now. This test does illustrate the points made. The IR light is weak, not much use but someone will use it
See a VERY short clip
__________________
Mike |
September 30th, 2014, 07:47 AM | #274 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
I am a little disappointed so far. It does not recognize the Sony MRW-E80 XQD card reader at all which PlayMemories does just fine, it will only display/transfers AVCHD files and does not join these FAT32 flies into m2ts clips so pretty useless for me !! There are icons for files and clips in the lower right of the copy window but the clips icon is greyed out. So hope it is me not using correctly or maybe a future update but as it is it is useless to me. Will stay with using 3 programs ( Playmemories for AX1, Content Management Utility for NXCam AVCHD and PMB for the CX700 stuff). Since there is no driver for Win 8.1 for the MRW-E80 I will see if it works for the AX1 directly connected on my laptop later and report back.
Sony seem to be going backwards in their software. Playmemories has less features than PMB, the original NXCam Content Management Utility for me has more useful features than the newer Content Browser !!! Ron Evans |
September 30th, 2014, 07:49 AM | #275 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 427
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
About the only thing it does is add clip previews and playback. When you copy it to your hard drive it puts in the whole structure - not just the MXF files - it puts in XML files and if you are copying a group of clips you can't select copy all - you have to go down and individually select every other file (MXF) or organize them according to clip size and only copy the large files (XML files are only a few KB). You cannot drag and drop a group of clips into your NLE (at least not mine - Edius Pro 7). Content Browser was much simpler and more efficient.
Last edited by Barry J. Weckesser; September 30th, 2014 at 08:51 AM. |
September 30th, 2014, 09:47 AM | #276 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Posts: 75
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Strange piece of software that Catalyst Browser... You can't do much with it.
- transcode to another format must be done clip by clip, rather annoying when you have 300 clips to transcode - strange way of browsing, not intuitive at all - adjust color: missing simple things like EXPOSURE or CONTRAST, or things like PRESETS - when selecting clips I hear loud ticks from my USB audio unit!?! Buggy - nowhere you can right click and get a nice context sensitive menu with lots of options - it can copy, wow, but you can already do that with finder or explorer - still can't open X70 clips with Final Cut - missing: adjusting the interface, dragging borders, adding or deleting columns - adding metadata not there - confusing keyboard functions... delete lets you browse up a level? This software isn't even for beginners. Let's just say it is a beta version with lots of possibilities for future expansion. |
September 30th, 2014, 09:55 AM | #277 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Tried Catalyst on my laptop , Win 8.1, did not recognize my FDR-AX1 but thought it was just an attached USB drive !!! It saw the XAVC-S files when I searched through the directories and would play them. PlayMemories recognizes it as a FDR-AX1 and presents the clips without having to search through the directories. The NX30U was recognized and metadata displayed but not clips just individual FAT32 files. Useless. I will wait to see if a real version appears in a future update.
Ron Evans |
September 30th, 2014, 06:19 PM | #278 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 427
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Quote:
I suspect some of the features that people really want will be in Catalyst Prepare at $200 a pop. |
|
October 1st, 2014, 12:29 AM | #279 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 160
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Quote:
__________________
Sony PMW-EX1, Canon 5DM2,60D, HV20, Sony Vegas 11 |
|
October 1st, 2014, 01:57 AM | #280 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
So what do we think of the quality of the footage? On "another forum" they are not impressed, calling it mushy and soft. Yes, I've seen the glass-blowing piece. Yes it looks very nice. What do our members who've got hands on experience think?
|
October 1st, 2014, 03:08 AM | #281 |
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,065
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
It has potential for great footage. but easily suffers from noticeable noise in shadows and/or low light. Some of the zooming exacerbates this.
I feel that the higher quality XAVC format is slightly wasted on the camera. You can also hear the zoom servo when zooming quickly. Probably good value for the price point, though. Andrew PS. My experience with the camera is limited to reviewing the test footage that was linked to in an above post. Last edited by Andrew Smith; October 1st, 2014 at 04:20 AM. Reason: Added disclaimer re experience |
October 1st, 2014, 03:13 AM | #282 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 427
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
I have limited experience due to time constraints namely my son's Taekwondo class (shot in XAVC-L at 1080 60p) but imo it is every bit as good as my PMW 200 shooting the same material under same lighting conditions. I notice no mushiness - I can read the small lettering on the uniform patches and also the colors are excellent. You do have to pay a little more attention to proper focus with the 1" sensor and DOF consideration but I am pleased with the camera so far.
|
October 1st, 2014, 04:08 AM | #283 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Would you say those noise issues are worse/better than/equal to that on an EX1? That's a cam I get to use fairly often and have seen the footage in post a lot. In the dark with some gain applied (even 6 db) you can see some minor noise.
|
October 1st, 2014, 06:11 AM | #284 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 495
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
Now listed as "In Stock" at B&H - for now
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1072752-REG/sony_pxw_x70_professional_xdcam_compact.html |
October 1st, 2014, 07:03 AM | #285 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony PXW-X70 announced: Pro XDCAM version of AX100
|
| ||||||
|
|