![]() |
#961 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 676
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Dear Mark, Ok, you are right but how the microphone of Sony AX100 can be effective if it is on the top of the handycam? I think I will need an additional mic. Is it right?
__________________
A lonesome traveler looking for lost tribes around the world: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdv...DrZCaaw/videos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#962 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
I downloaded one of those AX100 UHD clips from youtube to try it in Sony Vegas Pro 12. Mediainfo says it's an AVC format, but what is the wrapper (and so, filename extension)? When I set it to mp4 Vegas doesn't load it at all; when I rename it to avc (at which point Windows doesn't have a thumbnail for it and displays it as generic file so I cannot use Mediainfo any more) VP12 allows to put it on the TL, but doesn't show picture! What's even more strange when I allow VP12 to set project properties basing on that clip, the framerate is set to 100.000 in the project (Mediainfo says 23.976 fps).
It's possible that I got some edited clip, encoded with some strange settings - so please tell me what the properties of this camera's native 2160p files are? Isn't the X-AVCS in the mxf wrapper?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#963 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
You never know how someone uploaded a clip. It could have been done as a raw clip from the camera or in some different format from their editing program. The files created from the camera are simple .mp4 files.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#964 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
XAVC-S is a mp4 wrapper. XAVC is a MXF wrapper. Almost all the files you will see on the internet will have been edited and other than Vegas Pro 12 most NLE's will not export XAVC-S so they will all be transcoded to some other format. Some on Vimeo may be unedited but I have not checked.
So the original files should be XAVC-S in a mp4 wrapper from the FDR-AX1 or FDR-AX100. From the PXW-Z100 they will be XAVC in a mxf wrapper. If they are anything else they will definitely have been edited. Most NLE's would then export an AVC/h264 file in mp4 wrapper as the closest. Vegas Pro 12 correctly identifies all frame rates from my FDR-AX1 in mp4 wrapper and will render in XAVC-S or XAVC. Ron Evans |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#965 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
As you know Ron, Edius 7 will also import the XAVC-S and export as .mp4 too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#966 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Edius is my main editor I mainly use Vegas for audio and yes Edius will edit XAVC-S and XAVC and will export mp4 just like Vegas but it will not export XAVC-S or even XAVC. Yet . mp4 is a wrapper so can use all sorts of encoding. There is a whole range of encoders in both Vegas and Edius for mp4 with various image sizes, frame rates and data rates.
Ron Evans |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#967 |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
"With all these little mics, beware of wind noise. If you will be working outside, your best choice is more likely to be the one that you can get the most effective wind muffler for, rather than the one with the very best sound quality in completely still air."
Totally, agree. I've had more audio ruined by wind than by bad mic audio quality. Foam doesn't work. You need a "dead cat" as provided with the Sony VG10. The Sony ECM-XYST1M has the correct muffler. Only $180. Stereo Microphone - Handycam Accessories Sony Store - Sony CA
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c Last edited by Steve Mullen; April 11th, 2014 at 08:44 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#968 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rome Italy
Posts: 676
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Why Sony has has mounted a proprietary shoe? I have to put Sony mic only, no Rode, no Shure, etc. Why did Sony make it? Do some guys usea differet external mic? If you have mounted an external mic on AX100, which mic please?
Thanks
__________________
A lonesome traveler looking for lost tribes around the world: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdv...DrZCaaw/videos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#969 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Remember this is a "consumer " camera and is set up for convenience. Not having any cable is better. If you want to use it in a professional manner you will have to allow for some adjustments. There is an XLR adapter you can buy and there is a new one being developed as well as another adapter for wireless product from Sony.
Ron Evans |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#970 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
The camera shoot XAVC S in an MP4 wrapper. It is just a high profile version of H.264. It also uses uncompressed PCM audio, but the Vimeo video has AAC to conform to the MP4 standard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#971 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,197
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Has anybody out there chroma key'd anything in 4k with their AX100?
I would imagine that the results would be extremely accurate. Especially if it were key'd in 4k with the intention of 1080 delivery. Any thoughts? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#972 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 288
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Another nice video, Mark. What frame rate?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#973 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ/NYC
Posts: 563
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
finally got to go shoot a little bit with it.
i have to say, i didn't enjoy it much. Yes it's a consumer camera, but it's a bit too consumer if you can make sense of that. The image it puts out IS very nice, rolling shutter while pretty strong still doesn't affect a good majority of shooting situations. Both screens are nice... 3 NDs are nice... a proper flip out screen is nice... looks nice and sharp But i just don't like how it's set up, probably because of the touch screen. and where's the image control? seriously just preset scenes and a general cinematone on or off? It's odd to me that this seems to be a definitively consumer orientated camera, with just a bare few pro-ish details, and still cost 2 grand. That, and the image stabilization is just peculiar: For standard stabilizer, it tells you that's for shooting in "stable" conditions. ok... and the active one is of course digital and says it turns on CIZ. But i've had what seems to be a bug: i was using digital zoom turned on (different from CIZ or so it seems?) and then i turned on active stabilizer, ok it modified the digital zoom, but then for some reason it now won't do any digital zoom with active stabilizer turned on. i've tried turning them both on and off and for some reason it won't give back any digital zoom with active stabilizer turned on. And while the standard stablizer is an improvement over the RX10, at longer focal lenghts it really shows a struggle, and don't even try it with any digital zoom in, for some reason it degrades exponentially. quite odd. and why did they put in an utterly pointless amount of digital zoom? up to 160x, needless to say it looks terrible, and considering that along with the nightshot mode, it seems this thing was designed by peeping toms. Looking through the footage though is indeed impressive, no doubt about that. sharp and pretty, but really not much way to get a flatter image out of it |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#974 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 148
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Hey guys a semi noob question, because the sensor is 14mp and presumably some of it used for digital image stabilization, does that mean that the minute you start using any zoom you are basically not filming 4k anymore since you are cropping the sensor more and more as you zoom? I ask because I was doing some tests with the camera today trying to extract as much shallow dof as I can with it which meant re-framing at different zoom levels and comparing, and I definitely noticed the image getting softer as I got further out on the zoom range. I wasn't sure if what I was seeing was the result of hitting limits on the camera's optics or if it was because at the longer range I wasn't really filming 4k anymore because of the sensor crop.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#975 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Darren, I never ever use any digital zoom on any camera. That's just asking for trouble. Now the clear image zoom that's engaged with Active IS is clearly (pun intended) better than the pure digital zoom.
The image degradation that occurs as you increasingly move into the full reach of the zoom, is very minor. Visible, but minor. Couple that with the fact that less resolution is needed when you're fully zoomed, and the impact of CIZ is not very significant. The nice benefit is that you now have a nicely detailed 18x zoom. But true digital zoom? Stay away! :) As for your glitch, did you try removing the battery and then reinserting? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|