|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 19th, 2006, 06:11 AM | #31 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: canterbury
Posts: 411
|
Thanks everyone, it's all sounding too good to be true. I look forward to seeing more, especially raw full frames, the CML guys will produce some great results im sure.
What kind of shutter adjustments can be made? The 10 bit log is great news, perhaps the best. I assume the WDR mentioned in the faq is a 12bit -> 10bit log curve created at capture time, rolling off highlights nicely? The WDR doesn't do anything special to the sensor? the full production implies that prior to that there might be limited availability? cheers paul |
April 19th, 2006, 06:18 AM | #32 |
Silicon Imaging, Inc.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy, NY USA
Posts: 325
|
Full production means that it is after the date we have been given for production releases of sensors. If we can get sensors earlier, we can have some cameras earlier. There will be a few being used internally and for a couple of showcase projects but that is all we know for sure. I wish I could say - thousands next week but I can't.
__________________
Silicon Imaging, Inc. We see the Light! http://www.siliconimaging.com |
April 19th, 2006, 06:28 AM | #33 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: .
Posts: 52
|
> WDR mentioned in the faq is a 12bit -> 10bit log curve created at capture time, rolling off highlights nicely? The WDR doesn't do anything special to the sensor?
Absolutely correct. As for shutter settings, yes they can be made, but I don't have accurate current information. You may want to repost this question on the Sillcon Imaging Forums. http://www.siliconimaging.com/phpBB/index.php cheers, Kyle |
April 19th, 2006, 08:34 AM | #34 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,095
|
BTW, I will be starting up a blog for a "Virtual NAB", so you can see the team in the Adobe booth, and any other goodies we think up :)
Thanks, Jason Silicon Imaging |
April 19th, 2006, 08:40 AM | #35 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,095
|
Quote:
Thanks, Jason Silicon Imaging Last edited by Jason Rodriguez; April 19th, 2006 at 09:18 AM. |
|
April 19th, 2006, 09:32 AM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atwater, CA
Posts: 246
|
Since the 1080p is captured at double fps and then frops every other frame. Then when doing 72 fps at 720p does the camera also run at double speed and drop everother frame? or does running the fps that high get rid of any rolling shutter artifact anyway?
|
April 19th, 2006, 09:38 AM | #37 |
Silicon Imaging, Inc.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy, NY USA
Posts: 325
|
Forrest,
Your second question is correct. Running at 72fps solves the problem without dropping frames - that that point it is about speed. -Steve
__________________
Silicon Imaging, Inc. We see the Light! http://www.siliconimaging.com |
April 19th, 2006, 01:15 PM | #38 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,095
|
Okay, to clarify the rolling shutter situation versus "dropping" frames, what we're basically doing is just running the chip as fast as we can. Whether we're doing extra vertical blanking, or skipping frames, we run the chip at 75Mhz or greater, which means the readout of the chip happens really fast. Because the read-out happens so fast, there is no time for the bottom of the frame to integrate longer than the top of the frame, hence no visible rolling shutter skew. Now there's always motion blur, but any camera has that.
Rolling shutter skew occurs because the readout on other CMOS chips is really slow as the electronic shutter goes from top-to-bottom. So at the time that integration ends, the chip is read-out from top to bottom . . . if this takes too long, then the bottom of the frame has captured light long after the top of the frame has ended light-gathering. If the read-out happens really quickly (as it is in our case), then the top and the bottom of the frame are shuttered almost together, and there's no skew. The speed of the rolling shutter is determined by the Mhz you're running the chip at. There are two ways to crank the chip Mhz up . . . either run at a fast frame-rate and then skip frames, or increase blanking so that the rolling shutter has to travel more "virtual" lines in a given time-frame before it gets back to the top of the frame. The more lines it has to scan through, the fast it runs, and the faster the clock freq. So if you see a CMOS sensor that is 40Mhz or lower (like cell-phone chips, consumer cameras, etc.), that's going to mean trouble for rolling shutter, because it means that the fastest the shutter can move across the chip is at a 40Mhz rate. The Altasens on the other-hand is now capable of up to 90Mhz, which is super-fast, and means no visible rolling shutter skew. Hope this all made sense. Jason Silicon Imaging |
April 19th, 2006, 05:00 PM | #39 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atwater, CA
Posts: 246
|
Thank you Steve and Jason. thats pretty cool, i wonder what mhz my cameras sensor is maxed at.
|
April 21st, 2006, 02:27 AM | #40 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 31
|
As long as all this double speed/dropping frames business still allows true 1/48th a second exposure at 24fps on the non-dropped frames, it's okay.
It's not actually making the shutter speed shorter than that, is it? |
April 21st, 2006, 09:21 AM | #41 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,762
|
Should be the same.
|
April 23rd, 2006, 03:44 PM | #42 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
The are many reasons professional cinematographers need larger sensors with higher dynamic range, 10-bit, with greatly reduced compression.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
April 24th, 2006, 11:49 AM | #43 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 175
|
whats the latest scoop on this? its already 2 hrs into NAB :)
|
April 24th, 2006, 04:37 PM | #44 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: venice, ca
Posts: 83
|
I want to see a picture of this awsome camera!!!
8) |
April 24th, 2006, 08:42 PM | #45 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
It is there and fully operational.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
| ||||||
|
|