|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 12th, 2006, 04:28 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 513
|
Just finished a 60-second spot, take a look...
Well, this is my first 60-second spot with any type of budget. It's for a landing net manufacturer called Adventure Products. (www.adventureproducts.com)
http://www.reelinspirations.com/adve...ucts/ego_3.wmv Would love any feedback on the spot. The only thing I didn't do was compose the music and do the voiceover. Thanks, Jim |
December 12th, 2006, 07:36 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 755
|
Nicely done!
Did you do the "Wire-frame net" work yourself? Very nice. Mike |
December 12th, 2006, 08:02 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 226
|
That looked great! If you don't mind me asking, what was your budget on that project? You used an HVX right?
|
December 12th, 2006, 09:33 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LA, California, USA
Posts: 224
|
Nice! I have two recommendations, which relate directly to each other -
1) His hat throws a shadow on his face, and although I understand we are supposed to focus on the product I find its people viewers generally connect with - 2) If removing his hat wasn't an option (as fisherman love their hats), was a reflector of any kind used to try and light up his face? |
December 13th, 2006, 08:58 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 513
|
Mike - Yes, I modeled the net in Lightwave and then rendered out two different versions using the same Layout project. One full 3D, the other a wireframe.
Noah - Actually, I shot with a Z1U for the above water shots and a Sony VX-1000 for the underwater shot. Since I'm just starting out, I didn't think I could charge what I thought it was worth. The client paid me $1,700 of which I will net $1,000 after expenses. (boat rental, music, voice over, etc.) Ari - Yes, I had a reflector, but not enough 'crew' to help out. That kind of bothered me too, but the focus is the net. Thanks for the compliments. Jim |
December 13th, 2006, 09:34 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 172
|
James
How'd ya get that overhead shot? Who did the graphics? Nice Job! |
December 13th, 2006, 09:40 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
|
James, Nice job on a small budget, I'm sure it will lead to bigger things. Congrats.
|
December 13th, 2006, 10:41 AM | #8 |
Major Player
|
Nice work! Demonstrates the product very well I thought. Only other thing I might have added was a couple ECUs on the net with a bass fighting around in it with the classic slow-mo. Especially if that net is made not to tangle line... something I really hate about most nets I've ever used :)
|
December 15th, 2006, 04:20 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 513
|
Thanks again for the comments.
John, I shot with a Century Optics 6.0 non-zoom WA adapter from another boat. I didn't stand on anything other than the boat. Also, I did all the graphics myself from scratch in Lightwave 3D and After Effects. Thanks again, Jim |
January 2nd, 2007, 08:04 AM | #10 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dubai - UAE
Posts: 24
|
Hi James,
Great video, I have a question about the support you were using while shooting from the boat? (did you use any stabilizer or anything like that?) |
January 2nd, 2007, 11:59 AM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
I think you should have used a better looking boat or really polished that one up. a better boat says "People who want the best buy these nets".
2) I'd avoid showing CF numbers unless is says something like "fishing net" 3) I thought you relied on that one shot of the net and fisherman too much. Would have preferred a few more angles. 4) have you considered using a testimonial or two? 5) you should charge more for a your abilities. |
| ||||||
|
|