New XL2 Music Video at DVinfo.net

Giuseppe Palumbo · April 1st, 2006, 01:16 PM

I Just finished making a New rock Video with the Xl2. It was a two day shoot. One Day at the Bar Location and another for all the story part of the video.

Xl2
Halogen Work Lamps for lighting.
PVC Dolly. (57$)

http://blip.tv/file/get/Peppe-TalkinToMe127.mov

Giuseppe Palumbo · April 2nd, 2006, 10:50 AM

C'mon, Anyone? tell me what ya think...

Travis Maynard · April 3rd, 2006, 05:48 AM

I enjoyed it.

Only one thing that stood out to me, when you have the "one year later" shot, the text sticks out really bad. Maybe change the text?

Otherwise good work.

Makes me wish I had something to film. I think when I bought my XL2 it killed the part of my brain that comes up with ideas.

Mark Bournes · April 3rd, 2006, 02:45 PM

I liked it except for the closing shot. I felt it needed a stronger ending.

Eniola Akintoye · April 3rd, 2006, 03:09 PM

Giuseppe,
I am always impressed by your work.
I think the music video is very good except for the indoor shots where the girl fell and all of that.
I really think a DVX would have made it more filmic or those scenes needed some more CC to make it not look home video.

The Bar scene was way much better. Do you have stills of your set?

Giuseppe Palumbo · April 3rd, 2006, 11:52 PM

thanks for all the responses and all. About the closing shot, its basically what the client wanted, So id say im mainly responsible for filming and editing. None of the story or pre-production is really my responsibility. I just bought a Nikon D50 last week so ill have set stills always for the most part now, cant wait...

-About the CC/Home Video look, i think im gonna bring the vegas file back up and take some stuff in AE. Not sure, We'll see...

Edward Tomecko · February 23rd, 2007, 01:27 PM

I bet that's what YOUR client wanted! advice: destroy the footage you took from the studio and remove the posts of YOUR version of this video from the internet. you have no right doing this. you were payed "work for hire" to shoot this job, that's all. you were asked this over a year ago. please respect the parties involved. c'mon peppe, do the right thing! thank you.

Andy Lunn · February 24th, 2007, 09:03 AM

good video.

the first shots out of focus, is that intentional?
how did you achieve the almost sofy hightlight strips over the bar shots? something in post?
what kit was used in the bar? lighting? camera? what format was it shot on?

Bob Sandifer · February 24th, 2007, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward Tomecko

I bet that's what YOUR client wanted! advice: destroy the footage you took from the studio and remove the posts of YOUR version of this video from the internet. you have no right doing this. you were payed "work for hire" to shoot this job, that's all. you were asked this over a year ago. please respect the parties involved. c'mon peppe, do the right thing! thank you.

Did I miss something here? He sounds a little PO'ed LOL

Edward Tomecko · February 24th, 2007, 12:34 PM

let's just say someone needs to make things right. i am am not one to slander ( have been, though!), there is a blatent misuse of private property going on here and a certain party should cease and desist. it is a matter of business and should not be used as a personal gains tool, period. the owner of the works is quite upset that the certain party is utilizing un-released material and representing it as his own, when the final product of the music video and the song is not what this certain party is displaying! the music track isn't even mixed! this is my only warning. the client is moving forward legally......

Giuseppe Palumbo · February 24th, 2007, 12:57 PM

Alright, I edited this video when i was bored one day. I love making videos and have a passion for it. Im sorry for wanting to show the Video community something im very proud of and merely wanted opinions on????

Giuseppe Palumbo · February 24th, 2007, 01:38 PM

someone should just delete this thread.

Edward Tomecko · February 24th, 2007, 01:40 PM

you should KNOW NOW that's not the point! please don't water this down either. my company is ultimately responsible for this fiasco, the client has been quite calm for the most part and this should not be taken lightly. prior to you slanderring me on the internet you could have simply asked the client through me to allow you display what you were payed to shoot for HIS video. (when it was completed!) But we know it didn't work out that way. we all know you are a talented kid... but take some time to think about the other parties involved before you act. BTW i saw your a-bomb video. nice work

Daniel Gast · February 24th, 2007, 04:02 PM

...so you're upset that he posted his own edit of a video he shot? Was there a contract drawn up that says he can't display this footage. Or did he sell you the rights to this footage?

I'm not sure on what grounds he can't post something he himself shot, unless, as I said before, it's been sold to the client.

Just trying to figure this out, it was a good video, I had comments, but if they don't matter, I won't bother.

Edward Tomecko · February 24th, 2007, 08:19 PM

just to clarify, then i'm done talking about this. he was hired to shoot the video with his camera, on MY tapes and for MY client. the song was not finished, not copywritten and certainly not released to the public at the time he came into the editing studio copied the files onto a hard drive took them home and made his own version of the video. without consent from the client. he doesn't even have the right title of the song. i have to deal with an irate client because his song is being misrepresented on the world wide web. can someone go to their job, shoot something for the company, then take home the raw footage to the publicly display the work? unfinished and protected music and all? it's tempting to want to edit video you shot. doesn't the client have rights? peace!

April 1st, 2006, 01:16 PM	#1
Giuseppe Palumbo Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 199 Images: 7	New XL2 Music Video I Just finished making a New rock Video with the Xl2. It was a two day shoot. One Day at the Bar Location and another for all the story part of the video. Xl2 Halogen Work Lamps for lighting. PVC Dolly. (57$) http://blip.tv/file/get/Peppe-TalkinToMe127.mov __________________ AIM - N film B www.nbfilms.us

April 2nd, 2006, 10:50 AM	#2
Giuseppe Palumbo Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 199 Images: 7	C'mon, Anyone? tell me what ya think... __________________ AIM - N film B www.nbfilms.us

April 3rd, 2006, 11:52 PM	#6
Giuseppe Palumbo Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 199 Images: 7	thanks for all the responses and all. About the closing shot, its basically what the client wanted, So id say im mainly responsible for filming and editing. None of the story or pre-production is really my responsibility. I just bought a Nikon D50 last week so ill have set stills always for the most part now, cant wait... -About the CC/Home Video look, i think im gonna bring the vegas file back up and take some stuff in AE. Not sure, We'll see... __________________ AIM - N film B www.nbfilms.us

February 23rd, 2007, 01:27 PM	#7
Edward Tomecko Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: cleveland, ohio Posts: 55	rock video I bet that's what YOUR client wanted! advice: destroy the footage you took from the studio and remove the posts of YOUR version of this video from the internet. you have no right doing this. you were payed "work for hire" to shoot this job, that's all. you were asked this over a year ago. please respect the parties involved. c'mon peppe, do the right thing! thank you. Last edited by Edward Tomecko; February 23rd, 2007 at 02:36 PM.

February 24th, 2007, 12:34 PM	#10
Edward Tomecko Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: cleveland, ohio Posts: 55	a little.!@#$%^& let's just say someone needs to make things right. i am am not one to slander ( have been, though!), there is a blatent misuse of private property going on here and a certain party should cease and desist. it is a matter of business and should not be used as a personal gains tool, period. the owner of the works is quite upset that the certain party is utilizing un-released material and representing it as his own, when the final product of the music video and the song is not what this certain party is displaying! the music track isn't even mixed! this is my only warning. the client is moving forward legally......

April 3rd, 2006, 05:48 AM	#3
Travis Maynard Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Chapmanville, USA Posts: 138	I enjoyed it. Only one thing that stood out to me, when you have the "one year later" shot, the text sticks out really bad. Maybe change the text? Otherwise good work. Makes me wish I had something to film. I think when I bought my XL2 it killed the part of my brain that comes up with ideas.

April 3rd, 2006, 02:45 PM	#4
Mark Bournes Major Player Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Jupiter, FL Posts: 565	I liked it except for the closing shot. I felt it needed a stronger ending.

April 3rd, 2006, 03:09 PM	#5
Eniola Akintoye Major Player Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Duluth GA Posts: 238	Giuseppe, I am always impressed by your work. I think the music video is very good except for the indoor shots where the girl fell and all of that. I really think a DVX would have made it more filmic or those scenes needed some more CC to make it not look home video. The Bar scene was way much better. Do you have stills of your set?

February 24th, 2007, 09:03 AM	#8
Andy Lunn Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Leeds UK Posts: 94	good video. the first shots out of focus, is that intentional? how did you achieve the almost sofy hightlight strips over the bar shots? something in post? what kit was used in the bar? lighting? camera? what format was it shot on?

February 24th, 2007, 12:57 PM	#11
Giuseppe Palumbo Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 199 Images: 7	Alright, I edited this video when i was bored one day. I love making videos and have a passion for it. Im sorry for wanting to show the Video community something im very proud of and merely wanted opinions on???? __________________ AIM - N film B www.nbfilms.us

February 24th, 2007, 01:38 PM	#12
Giuseppe Palumbo Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 199 Images: 7	someone should just delete this thread. __________________ AIM - N film B www.nbfilms.us

February 24th, 2007, 01:40 PM	#13
Edward Tomecko Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: cleveland, ohio Posts: 55	well... you should KNOW NOW that's not the point! please don't water this down either. my company is ultimately responsible for this fiasco, the client has been quite calm for the most part and this should not be taken lightly. prior to you slanderring me on the internet you could have simply asked the client through me to allow you display what you were payed to shoot for HIS video. (when it was completed!) But we know it didn't work out that way. we all know you are a talented kid... but take some time to think about the other parties involved before you act. BTW i saw your a-bomb video. nice work

February 24th, 2007, 04:02 PM	#14
Daniel Gast Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Miami, Florida, USA Posts: 69	...so you're upset that he posted his own edit of a video he shot? Was there a contract drawn up that says he can't display this footage. Or did he sell you the rights to this footage? I'm not sure on what grounds he can't post something he himself shot, unless, as I said before, it's been sold to the client. Just trying to figure this out, it was a good video, I had comments, but if they don't matter, I won't bother. __________________ Dan Gast JD Video Productions

February 24th, 2007, 08:19 PM	#15
Edward Tomecko Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: cleveland, ohio Posts: 55	clarification just to clarify, then i'm done talking about this. he was hired to shoot the video with his camera, on MY tapes and for MY client. the song was not finished, not copywritten and certainly not released to the public at the time he came into the editing studio copied the files onto a hard drive took them home and made his own version of the video. without consent from the client. he doesn't even have the right title of the song. i have to deal with an irate client because his song is being misrepresented on the world wide web. can someone go to their job, shoot something for the company, then take home the raw footage to the publicly display the work? unfinished and protected music and all? it's tempting to want to edit video you shot. doesn't the client have rights? peace!