Show Your Work 2006

Kyle Fasanella · June 29th, 2006, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rafael Lopes

Looks amazing! Veru film-like! Did you use a polarizer filter directly on the camera? What were the camera settings?

i used cinaframe and added contrast in premiere pro

Rafael Lopes · June 29th, 2006, 08:33 AM

Only cinetone and contrast?! That's it?! Man, I always do that with my FX1 and it doesn't look like that at all. Your colors are so saturated and you don't have that harsh video look. Frankly, I've seen a lot of FX1/Z1 footage and yours is among the most film-looking. Level with us, Kyle. Share the love, brother. What's your secret potion?

Brian Standing · June 29th, 2006, 09:09 AM

I just posted a couple of new projects on my website.

1. Psalm 5: Nicaraguan poet and Sandinista revolutionary Ernesto Cardenal reads his rewrite of the Old Testament Psalm.
http://www.prolefeedstudios.com/cata...m5/psalm5.html

2. Why Are You Here?
An experiment in an interactive, online mini-documentary on the May Day immigrant rights protests.
http://www.prolefeedstudios.com/cata...ay/mayday.html

Nothing fancy editing-wise, but I thought it might be of interest. Comments welcome.

Justin Tomchuk · June 29th, 2006, 10:00 AM

Yes, this does look very nice for video. Nice editing skills and there are some great shots. I admit though, it got dull about half way through. You need something more to captivate out attention other than editing and the picture quality, the content. The one liners were obvious and it was stuff we pretty much already know, but I can understand how that isn't your fault.

Kyle Fasanella · June 29th, 2006, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rafael Lopes

Only cinetone and contrast?! That's it?! Man, I always do that with my FX1 and it doesn't look like that at all. Your colors are so saturated and you don't have that harsh video look. Frankly, I've seen a lot of FX1/Z1 footage and yours is among the most film-looking. Level with us, Kyle. Share the love, brother. What's your secret potion?

well I dont shoot at night or indoors. I cut a lot of the crap out of my videos. you watch about 5% of the footage. that be my guess. also I zoom in all the way for DOF

Murray Robinson · June 29th, 2006, 10:58 PM

I don't mean to sound kinda pushy, but can somebody give me some response? I would truly appreciate it.

Don Donatello · June 30th, 2006, 01:58 AM

i liked it ... and i liked that i was surprised at the ending ..
the streaming quality is a bit low so it's difficult to tell but i would have to say the lighting is so-so ..
IMO the light needs to be shaped ( as in you add light to a shot then you need to start taking light away in areas ( shape it - using nets , flags , barn doors, black wrap ) .. again it's a hard to make a call but the light seemed harsh ( could be just the low quality stream, you light try "opal " gel on your lights ? ) .. there's hard light and then harsh light ... i liked the shadows on the walls of the band (members) ..

Eric Emerick · June 30th, 2006, 09:25 AM

Here's a little something that took about 10 days from concept to finished DVD, called Night of the Headsman. I referenced the hospital hallway scene from Exorcist 3, it always scares me. Shot with Canon XL2 and Pro Mist 1/2 filter. Hope you enjoy it. http://web.mac.com/esquared14/iWeb/Site/Welcome.html

Murray Robinson · June 30th, 2006, 11:28 AM

Thanks for the reply. I don't know too much about lighting (this was my first attempt). The indoor stuff was the hardest to light as we were only using flood lights and plain light bulbs in homemade box lights (wooden frames with a metal around the bulb for reflection. We also used a single photo light (can't remember what it was now) The outdoor stuff of the band was lit by a 500W halogen lamp, a 250W halogen, and a 100W flood. Like I said, no budget. How was the editing and cinematography and editing?

Jaadgy Akanni · June 30th, 2006, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murray Robinson

Thanks for the reply. I don't know too much about lighting (this was my first attempt). The indoor stuff was the hardest to light as we were only using flood lights and plain light bulbs in homemade box lights (wooden frames with a metal around the bulb for reflection. We also used a single photo light (can't remember what it was now) The outdoor stuff of the band was lit by a 500W halogen lamp, a 250W halogen, and a 100W flood. Like I said, no budget. How was the editing and cinematography and editing?

If this is indeed your first attempt and considering the lack of resources as far as lighting gear, this video is impressive. You're on the right track. I like the way your laid out the story. As far as the music, well, I've already tasted it, swallowed it, digested it and evacuated it---in the '90's! Sorry, I happen to be a music producer too, so i couldn't resist commenting on the music.

Murray Robinson · June 30th, 2006, 10:09 PM

Thanks guys, keep them up.

Nick Posen · July 1st, 2006, 11:53 AM

here is a movie intro I started making, i need some input on it here:

http://communityvideo.aol.com/Playba...ndex=1&page=10

Justin Tomchuk · July 1st, 2006, 12:29 PM

Way too long. You really only need 20-30 seconds maximum for this type of project. After the text showed up it was just the police lights for like a minute which I really don't get. The font design and texture for the title 'swat' was corny looking, and the name itself is very generic. I think it's a good concept and I am not sure if you are going to cut it down or whatnot, but those are my opinions.

My best advice would be to keep it simple, it is a great way to start a feature film but unless you really know what you're doing it shouldn't be so elaborate.

Justin

Steve House · July 1st, 2006, 12:45 PM

Why 3 minutes of music to sustain 25 seconds of visual? Go to another shot about 4 beats after the "T" disappears or end it. Liked the smokey background and the soft focus rooflights, not too keen on the font and colour used for the title graphic. Strongly suggest you reduce the bass substantially in the music - a strong base line is one thing, having all the melody completely lost underneath the bass is something else again.

Nick Posen · July 1st, 2006, 12:59 PM

Hi, thanks for your opinions. yea i know it was long, i just didnt get to cut it down when i exported it. all that extra time is gonna have the like director and actors and writer and all that. as for the text what ideas do you have to make it more apealing. thanks again -Nick

June 29th, 2006, 09:09 AM	#513
Brian Standing Major Player Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Madison, Wisconsin Posts: 621	Two Online Docs I just posted a couple of new projects on my website. 1. Psalm 5: Nicaraguan poet and Sandinista revolutionary Ernesto Cardenal reads his rewrite of the Old Testament Psalm. http://www.prolefeedstudios.com/cata...m5/psalm5.html 2. Why Are You Here? An experiment in an interactive, online mini-documentary on the May Day immigrant rights protests. http://www.prolefeedstudios.com/cata...ay/mayday.html Nothing fancy editing-wise, but I thought it might be of interest. Comments welcome.

June 30th, 2006, 09:25 AM	#518
Eric Emerick Regular Crew Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Melbourne, FL Posts: 171	Short Suspense/Horror Here's a little something that took about 10 days from concept to finished DVD, called Night of the Headsman. I referenced the hospital hallway scene from Exorcist 3, it always scares me. Shot with Canon XL2 and Pro Mist 1/2 filter. Hope you enjoy it. http://web.mac.com/esquared14/iWeb/Site/Welcome.html __________________ esquared

July 1st, 2006, 11:53 AM	#522
Nick Posen Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Clinton, New jersey Posts: 26	Movie intro, need some input and suggestions here is a movie intro I started making, i need some input on it here: http://communityvideo.aol.com/Playba...ndex=1&page=10

July 1st, 2006, 12:45 PM	#524
Steve House Inner Circle Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Posts: 5,742	Why 3 minutes of music to sustain 25 seconds of visual? Go to another shot about 4 beats after the "T" disappears or end it. Liked the smokey background and the soft focus rooflights, not too keen on the font and colour used for the title graphic. Strongly suggest you reduce the bass substantially in the music - a strong base line is one thing, having all the melody completely lost underneath the bass is something else again. __________________ Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams!

June 29th, 2006, 08:33 AM	#512
Rafael Lopes Trustee Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Rio de Janeiro Posts: 1,240	Only cinetone and contrast?! That's it?! Man, I always do that with my FX1 and it doesn't look like that at all. Your colors are so saturated and you don't have that harsh video look. Frankly, I've seen a lot of FX1/Z1 footage and yours is among the most film-looking. Level with us, Kyle. Share the love, brother. What's your secret potion?

June 29th, 2006, 10:00 AM	#514
Justin Tomchuk Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Montreal Posts: 164	Yes, this does look very nice for video. Nice editing skills and there are some great shots. I admit though, it got dull about half way through. You need something more to captivate out attention other than editing and the picture quality, the content. The one liners were obvious and it was stuff we pretty much already know, but I can understand how that isn't your fault.

June 29th, 2006, 10:58 PM	#516
Murray Robinson New Boot Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 9	I don't mean to sound kinda pushy, but can somebody give me some response? I would truly appreciate it.

June 30th, 2006, 01:58 AM	#517
Don Donatello Hawaiian Shirt Mogul Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: northern cailfornia Posts: 1,261	i liked it ... and i liked that i was surprised at the ending .. the streaming quality is a bit low so it's difficult to tell but i would have to say the lighting is so-so .. IMO the light needs to be shaped ( as in you add light to a shot then you need to start taking light away in areas ( shape it - using nets , flags , barn doors, black wrap ) .. again it's a hard to make a call but the light seemed harsh ( could be just the low quality stream, you light try "opal " gel on your lights ? ) .. there's hard light and then harsh light ... i liked the shadows on the walls of the band (members) ..

June 30th, 2006, 11:28 AM	#519
Murray Robinson New Boot Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 9	Thanks for the reply. I don't know too much about lighting (this was my first attempt). The indoor stuff was the hardest to light as we were only using flood lights and plain light bulbs in homemade box lights (wooden frames with a metal around the bulb for reflection. We also used a single photo light (can't remember what it was now) The outdoor stuff of the band was lit by a 500W halogen lamp, a 250W halogen, and a 100W flood. Like I said, no budget. How was the editing and cinematography and editing?

June 30th, 2006, 10:09 PM	#521
Murray Robinson New Boot Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada Posts: 9	Thanks guys, keep them up.

July 1st, 2006, 12:29 PM	#523
Justin Tomchuk Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Montreal Posts: 164	Way too long. You really only need 20-30 seconds maximum for this type of project. After the text showed up it was just the police lights for like a minute which I really don't get. The font design and texture for the title 'swat' was corny looking, and the name itself is very generic. I think it's a good concept and I am not sure if you are going to cut it down or whatnot, but those are my opinions. My best advice would be to keep it simple, it is a great way to start a feature film but unless you really know what you're doing it shouldn't be so elaborate. Justin

July 1st, 2006, 12:59 PM	#525
Nick Posen Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Clinton, New jersey Posts: 26	Hi, thanks for your opinions. yea i know it was long, i just didnt get to cut it down when i exported it. all that extra time is gonna have the like director and actors and writer and all that. as for the text what ideas do you have to make it more apealing. thanks again -Nick