|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 6th, 2004, 08:54 PM | #1 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Finally! my sophomore(ic) effort
So, what's the Bass been up to all this time? Jeez! He only got one more short done in a year's time? No! I've had other things going on, just not my stuff--works for hire. Anyway, no one cares, so here's the link. This is powerful stuff, people. Beware.
Thank the great and powerful Paul Sedillo for hosting this on his website. http://bass.piranha-club.com/ Don't know how long it'll take to download--it's compressed to MPEG-1, and is 37 megs. Guess some people will be waiting awhile :-(. Oh well, once you do wait, you won't be there long, cause it's only 3:43! |
January 6th, 2004, 09:02 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
The footage is really dark. I'd brighten it up just a bit.
Other than that, funny!
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
January 6th, 2004, 09:09 PM | #3 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Interesting--I find it looks different everywhere I view it. On computer (in Vegas 4's preview window): foggy, as though I pushed the black level up (I didn't). On my computer (through the quicktime player): perfect. On my NTSC monitor: perfect. On my dad's TV: foggy. On my mom's TV: perfect (or foggy, depending on whether the TV's set to movie or normal mode). On my girlfriend's TV: somewhat dark. Projected digitally on a 20' square screen: beautiful except for some highlights blowing out on a few shots. Who knows?
|
January 6th, 2004, 09:20 PM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,933
|
I agree with Dylan. DV footage invariably needs to be brightened (actually, gamma-adjusted) prior to web publication.
Nice final credit.
__________________
All the best, Robert K S Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | The best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
January 6th, 2004, 09:22 PM | #5 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Any DV footage? Or just mine? Probably any, indicated by the word "invariably."
|
January 7th, 2004, 04:15 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC, USA
Posts: 97
|
Can you link directly to the video file? The page keeps crashing my IE for whatever reason.
__________________
http://duffx.com |
January 7th, 2004, 04:27 PM | #7 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Well, it's not on my computer--my buddy AND FELLOW DVINFO.NET MEMBER PAUL SEDILLO is hosting it. I think it does link directly to the file--when you type that URL in (or click it), it starts loading/playing when the page comes up. I'm sure I don't know what I'm talking about however.
|
January 7th, 2004, 06:57 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 316
|
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAAHHAHAHA. That was hallarious. Good work.
|
January 8th, 2004, 08:55 AM | #9 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Direct download link (right-click etc.)
You keep doing weird stuff eh! Excellent short though. At first I thought not another one of those, but the revelation and the final tears did it! I really liked the alley (lighting) look as well!
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
January 8th, 2004, 02:13 PM | #10 |
Hawaiian Shirt Mogul
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: northern cailfornia
Posts: 1,261
|
why did you choose mpeg 1 to stream ??
|
January 8th, 2004, 05:22 PM | #11 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Uh. . .I compressed it to MPEG 1 because it was easy to fit on a CD-R, and Paul Sedillo, or "God," did the rest. What should I have done instead? MPEG-2? Does it really look that different when playing on your computer? That's not a hostile question; I''m genuinely interested. My computer monitor (and the processor) is getting progressively more low-tech compared to what's out there now.
|
January 8th, 2004, 07:54 PM | #12 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,933
|
Yes, you'll get a much better compression ratio with a less ancient codec. Consider MPEG 2, or MPEG 4 or the Windows Media Video codec. I would recommend DivX except its new licensing terms and bugged player are more hassle than they're worth anymore.
MPEG 1 is good for CD distribution because even the oldest Windows systems are guaranteed to have the codec installed; but one can assume that anyone downloading content over the internet will have (or easily be able to obtain) newer codecs. The name of the game is to shrink your file size to allow people to see your film sooner, and ease up on your own bandwidth.
__________________
All the best, Robert K S Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | The best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
January 9th, 2004, 03:53 AM | #13 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Alright. I'll try it, of course it's up to Paul Sedillo to see if he'll put up with me invading his home again.
Out of MPEG-2 or -4, which is recommended? |
January 9th, 2004, 01:10 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 52
|
Mpeg 4
You could try the mpeg 4 codec that comes with Quicktime, it seems to play in newer versions of Windows media player too... oh ya, I enjoyed your short movie. It must have been difficult to keep a straight face while shooting that. :) |
January 9th, 2004, 01:12 PM | #15 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Alright, perhaps I shall. In the meantime, suffer!
j/k. |
| ||||||
|
|