|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 17th, 2006, 08:06 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
|
SO Underwriters Laboratories has not put the seal of approval on them. Wonder why. Wiring is probably sub standard. You're talking a LOT of amps, so it's possible their wiring isn't up to US code, or they don't have a circuit breaker. Something like that.
But I'd like to know what their price range is, and what it would take to get them up to grade. I suspect you'd have to import in mass to get the price break. |
March 17th, 2006, 09:15 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 475
|
I've send an email to the German guys regarding prices. I'll keep you guys posted!
|
March 17th, 2006, 09:42 AM | #18 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
A little OT, but amusing anyway. Was recently talking to a theatrical lighting designer who did a big production in China at the "Great Hall of the People" (or whatever). She said they had to allow a full afternoon for the fire dept to test their entire lighting rig. All the pipes had to be lowered to the floor and each instrument was examined and tested with temperature probes to insure they were within specs; she'd never seen anything like it before! So if these HMI fixtures are used in China they might actually exceed our own US specs... |
|
March 19th, 2006, 02:28 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,570
|
Got a reply to pricing on the 200W HMI, roughly USD 1,500 for a full kit.
Interestingly these lights can be run off battery, the battery goes for just under USD 1000, that may include a charger. No info as yet on how long the battery will run the light. The design looks very similar to the Joker Bug from K5600. but way cheaper. |
March 19th, 2006, 03:04 PM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 475
|
That's a very good price! Looking forward to some hands one experience if possible. Don't need it right away but maybe if I do I'll ride down to Germany to test out.
|
March 21st, 2006, 04:18 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
Posts: 287
|
Hmm. Reading too much too fast I guess. I was thinking about something like the Joker Bug setup that lets you use an HMI fixture in a Chinese latern. Apologies. At least the thread holds together better :-)
As for the PAR terminology, it may be "old style", but the intergrated lamp/reflector/lens design is still very much alive and well. If you can separate the lamp and the reflector and the lens, then I sort of want to call it something else. Maybe it is just symatics. I'm sure that ETC is going after the traditional PAR can with their swapable lens design, but their naming convention is a little confusing to me. I haven't seen their "PAR" show up much in film lighting but maybe they will. They seem to be pretty efficient instruments. The Source Four, meanwhile (the ellipsoidal one), is the Xerox of the ellipsoidal world. People say Source Four instead of ellipsoidal. Carrying that name into their can design seems confusing. |
March 22nd, 2006, 05:47 AM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 56
|
on the cheap side
Dear People
What about an automobile xenon as a day light source. It should work. 1 Its colour temp. is over 5000k 2 It comes in sealed PAR unit 3 It has a portable small balast 4 One could run it out of a car battery or out of a cars engine. 5 getting someone to seat in front of the cars xenon beam and shoot some test should not cost an arm and a leg. my 2 cents Alexandre |
March 22nd, 2006, 08:16 PM | #23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28
|
Alexandre:
I've tried this already, as a matter of fact. Here are the problems: 1) Many automotive Xenon or Metal Halide lamps burn at 10,000k. That would be fine, save for the fact that you'll lose about half of the lamp's output trying to bring the color temp back down to 5600k (with 1 + 1/2 CTO) 2) While the ballasts are electronic, they're not flicker-free and produce quite a bit of noise. I've shot tests with the DVX100 in 24p and it's not pretty... 3) Low wattage. 30 to 125W. Good for an eyelight I suppose, but losing half of your already insignificant punch to color correction is a bummer. That said, I'm looking into building a daylight maxi brute-type fixture with automotive bulbs. Could be very useful if you're looking to add a little ambient light to an exterior location... Henry
__________________
Henry Kieffer VanAllen Gretzinger DP, NYC |
March 23rd, 2006, 10:19 AM | #24 |
Chimera Lighting
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz CA
Posts: 293
|
Go find China lights if you want
but I would check out www.k5600.com
all you need is ballast problems and your screwed plus see if the chinese are still using Magnetic ballast.. it that what i am looking for.. Magnetic.. correct me dv team they are unrelyable and no one uses them anymore. electronic ballast very important should you need repair mole Digi Light hmi also nice r
__________________
Strength and Honor RLV |
March 23rd, 2006, 01:41 PM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
Posts: 287
|
Magnetic ballast
I don't think any of the major brands use magnetic ballasts anymore, but there are certainly a lot of them still in use, especially at lower budget rental places. They are very heavy, inefficient, and often noisy along with some flicker problems but they do work. It's still an excellent point to check out, however, since magnetic ballasts are cheaper to manufacture than electronic ones, and the ballast is a significant portion of the cost in an HMI.
|
April 6th, 2006, 04:40 PM | #26 |
Chimera Lighting
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz CA
Posts: 293
|
I like www.k5600.com
Many of their kits have Chimera Lanterns.
The lights K5600 make are great. Some AC capability as well. r
__________________
Strength and Honor RLV |
April 7th, 2006, 04:16 AM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,570
|
Magnetic Ballasts
As far as I know these are more reliable than electronic ones, there's almost nothing in them to fail. But they are heavier. Still used in cinema projectors, weight doesn't really matter in this case. Flicker level should the same, HMIs run on DC, around 80V. For lower power HMIs electronic ballasts are pretty much standard fare but over 10KW, I think you'll find mostly magnetic ballasts. I don't know if electronic ballasts are any quieter either, once the power level goes up they can get pretty noisy and it's pretty high frequency noise, they're also more likely to produce interference due to the fast rise times in the high current switching circuits.
The Chinese HMIs we've been talking about do use electronic ballasts. |
| ||||||
|
|