|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 22nd, 2005, 04:31 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
light metre for hdv
can anyne tell me how to use a light meter with hdv. For example I have the hd100. When I take a light reading I am suppossed to enter the film speed and the meter tells me my f. stop (I think). What i'd lik eto know is what film speed do I enter or do I need some kind of special light metre.
Thanks Greg Corke P.S. can anyone reccomend a good meter for this purpose |
December 22nd, 2005, 04:51 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
I wouldn't bother with a light meter as the camera's built in one should be perfectly adequate. Of course it's a reflected light meter which means it's easily fooled by large areas of light or dark, but you can overcome that by metering off a standard grey card. If you use a grey card it's almost as good as using an incident light meter, and should stop you over exposing in the woods and under exposing in the snow.
tom. |
December 22nd, 2005, 08:49 AM | #3 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
December 22nd, 2005, 09:40 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 493
|
Greg,
If you are trying to find out what the ASA for your camera is. Light a gray card, allow the camera to auto-expose the card to 50IRE, and note the F-stop it is using. Then take a reading on the card with your light meter, and adjust the ASA setting until the F-stop readout on the meter matches what the camera came up with. That's your ASA. However, I know in another discussion (possibly on another board), people couldn't get a fix with one of the new HD cams. It varied across the range of F-stops in the camera. So, depending on how brightly you illuminate the card in the first step, you'll get a different reading. Not sure if that was the HD100 or not. Try the calibration illuminating the card at least two different levels and see if you get a consistent ASA. Josh
__________________
Owner/Operator, 727 Records Co-Founder, Matter of Chance Productions Blogger, Try Avoidance |
December 22nd, 2005, 10:10 AM | #5 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
December 22nd, 2005, 02:35 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 493
|
Yeh, definitely. Something was going on with the A/D or DSP in the camera, where the iris and sensitivity just wasn't linear.
I found the thread. Looks like this is the behavior in the HD100 and the DVX100.
__________________
Owner/Operator, 727 Records Co-Founder, Matter of Chance Productions Blogger, Try Avoidance |
December 23rd, 2005, 01:10 AM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Also, the lenses are not necessarily calibrated accurately enough that you can rely on the markings.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
December 23rd, 2005, 02:51 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
That's very true Charles. The marked maximum apertures are mathematically calculated, they're not T stops (True Transmission). And the aperture values as they appear in viewfinder readouts are only ever to the nearest half stop.
I makes a lot of folk think their lens hangs onto f/1.6 for some way into the zoom but of course it doesn't. The speed starts dropping immediately uou leave wide angle, it's just the display that's taking its time to display the next nearest half stop figure. tom. |
December 26th, 2005, 11:44 AM | #9 |
Hellgate Pictures, Inc.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 124
|
"However, I know in another discussion (possibly on another board), people couldn't get a fix with one of the new HD cams. It varied across the range of F-stops in the camera."
This is true of any video camera. Video cameras do not have very linear MTFs across the exposure range so if you try this trick outdoors, then do it at a different f-stop indoors your camera will register two completely different exposure indexes (EI). Video cameras are not measured in ASA so it would be incorrect to use that term. Exposure index (EI) would be more correct. You could get an estimate for proper exposure index at any one f-stop but that will not mean it will be as accurate once you go a few F-stops higher or lower. And HD cameras are no different than standard definition cameras so there would be nothing special to do and special result that would occur. Only with a chip chart and waveform can one get a more accurate reading and measurement translation for a light meter. ANd even then some interpretation must be done by the user. Walter Graff BlueSky Media, Inc. 888.435.5428 ext 31 Cell 917.217.9766 walter@bluesky-web.com www.bluesky-web.com Offices in NYC and Amherst Mass. |
December 31st, 2005, 08:23 PM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 2,054
|
You'd probably be better off hauling out a carefully set-up production monitor and checking your exposure and image quality directly off the screen.
Light meters were originally intended for film work where it would be impossible to predict the results without careful measurements prior to tripping the shutter. You might be able to determine if your general exposure is close but you won't be able to tell if you've blown any highlights within the entire scene. With video you can get immediate feedback, seeing precisely what you'd get as a final product, provided you use an accurate monitor and view it under reasonable conditions.
__________________
Dean Sensui Exec Producer, Hawaii Goes Fishing |
February 13th, 2008, 01:30 AM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,259
|
Any recommendations for such a monitor? THANKS!
|
February 13th, 2008, 01:44 AM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 1,811
|
Since you have the HD100 here is a thread about ASA for that camera, with posts by some experts with the camera:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...&highlight=ASA Similar comments to what are made here are made there, but there are also specific ASA numbers used by some people in defined situations. Here's another thread: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...&highlight=ASA If you go to the HD100 forum and just search for ASA you will get a lot of information and comments about people's experience with ASA and light meters. |
February 13th, 2008, 08:07 AM | #13 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 09:04 PM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
well back in the days of Sony D-30's I could light with my meter, and then iris the cameras when they came into the studio and be within a 1/2 stop of ideal between what I metered and what worked on the monitor. what I used the light meter for was balancing all the keys out to within .1 stops ( dimmers :) ). the video engineer's loved me because they didn't have to ride iris on a show :) set it and forget it.
the new camera's with all sorts of DSP now though change so much that a light meter is pretty much useless for setting exposure because of how they fiddle with the incoming light. then go and adjust the gamma curve and knee point and you are back in new territory again. the HD100 can vary from maybe ISO 100 to maybe 500 depending on the scene setup. I still use a light meter when doing chroma key work. basically I want the FG light level to match the BG light level and that the BG is lit evenly to within .1 stop. useless for setting camera iris though. |
February 14th, 2008, 06:52 PM | #15 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wurzburg, Germany
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
I'm using a digital Minolta lightmeter and I just set it to the standard setting: 100ASA. There's a table in the manual where you can look up the according lux values in this 100ASA setting but I don't do that because all I need is the differences between positions (or, the lack thereof) The f-stop is much more easily adjusted using a monitor and a waveform monitor. An eng camera like the HD100 has zebras to help you with correct exposure, you can set them from 70-100% usually, each having it's own benefits. 70% is pretty good for the brightest parts of a caucasian skin tone, good setting for talking heads set-ups. 100% shows what parts of the frame are beginning to blow out. Some cameras like the good old DXC-D30 are able to show both zebras at once, but the HD100 isn't, as far as I know. However, with what you see in the viewfinder and one of the zebra settings (or cycling between them) you can achieve a pretty good exposure real quick, no need for a light meter. Quote:
Last edited by Heiko Saele; February 14th, 2008 at 07:34 PM. |
||
| ||||||
|
|