|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 29th, 2020, 12:50 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 919
|
55w LED fresnel vs. Dedo vs. 300w tungsten
I put together a review for the Boltzen Q55II, which is an upgrade to the Mark I I've been using for a while now. Having looked at the Fiilex units and being underwhelmed by their output (and overwhelmed by their price), this one hit the sweet spot for me. The Mark I was great as an accent, hair or scratch light, but just a bit too weak to illuminate anything larger than a 1x2 softbox with double-diffusion. The manufacturer pulled some sort of magic trick and made the output 40% brighter for the same power draw...and best of all, I can run them at 100% off cheap Sony NP-F batteries if I don't want to deal with v-mounts.
That's going to be great news for travel shooters. My two light kit with a case is 1/2 the size of a typical Pelican 1510 based light kit. I'd love to know your thoughts. |
November 1st, 2020, 07:17 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: 55w LED fresnel vs. Dedo vs. 300w tungsten
Nice review. I own both Boltzen I and II and I agree with your assessment. The two batteries are huge. My MK 1 won't run ant any level with generic batteries. The app isn't good. If the connection drops it's difficult to reconnect. give me a physical remote any day. I hate the strobe dial. Because of their small form factor when you grab the light to adjust it or put on the light stand I often hit the strobe dial turn it on. Strobe is borderline gimmick feature it doesn't need it's own dedicated dial.
I've used this light for, wedding dance floor, hair or background interview light, outdoor interview where you just need quick key or fill light without expensive v mount batteries. I'm not a fan of trying to add modifiers for soft lighting this isn't the light for that use. The plastic tilt teeth isn't up to the task, even for a modest soft box. Maybe fabric clipped to the barn doors but nothing more than that. Most of my work is very unpredictable with little setup time. So I appreciate I can have something small, light, cheap and powerful that I can have at the ready when needed. |
November 2nd, 2020, 02:03 AM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lowestoft - UK
Posts: 4,045
|
Re: 55w LED fresnel vs. Dedo vs. 300w tungsten
It's a nice change to get straightforward reviews like this that have been thought through properly.
When you want to compare things, you sort of know what you need to know, and so many videos take you through the aspects that don't matter, and then hurry through the important stuff. Like the 4 in a stripe section with the captions. you can just press pause at that point and read and look. Thanks for this. The only thing missing was a guide price, so I popped off to Google to discover a quite sensible price. One of the sites was actually a Chinese company I dealt with already, so I can get a set quite cheaply. I've ordered a kit to have a try. Thanks for this. Paul |
November 4th, 2020, 10:32 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 919
|
Re: 55w LED fresnel vs. Dedo vs. 300w tungsten
Quote:
Still, I'm glad for the improvements they did make to the light. Those are more than welcome. Power increase is surprising, to say the least. |
|
November 4th, 2020, 10:35 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 919
|
Re: 55w LED fresnel vs. Dedo vs. 300w tungsten
Thanks for the feedback Paul. I completely understand about the lack of pricing info, and that was deliberate on my part. I've done reviews before that get watched years later (when prices change). It's also subject to change due to currency fluctuations and shortages, as has happened with certain 'hot' gear. I'll probably take a cue from other reviewers and leave a link to the website where they can be purchased.
|
| ||||||
|
|