|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 18th, 2007, 06:08 PM | #31 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Manalapan, NJ 07726
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
No i can't spell, or use Google
__________________
To capture an image, any camera needs a certain amount of illumination for proper exposure. Then start taking light away. |
|
February 18th, 2007, 06:51 PM | #32 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,797
|
You can dim them with any technology you want, it's just a light bulb. We use hundreds of them in our light plots. I think Jaron's point was that you should use a dimmer down at floor level so you don't have to climb a ladder and put some sort of filter on the light. Realize however that the color temperature will change considerably if you dim the lamp.
Jaron, I think the modern theatrical dimmers are pretty good at reducing "lamp sing". This is a new product that I've been hearing good things about for example: http://www.etcconnect.com/product.overview.asp?ID=20041 |
February 18th, 2007, 07:16 PM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lewisburg PA
Posts: 752
|
Actually the household dimmers aren't that bad now either. I just built a couple of in-line dimmers with parts from a big box hardware store (for under $20 a piece) to control 300w arri fresenels. I have not noticed any lamp noise at all.
|
February 18th, 2007, 07:30 PM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 439
|
i agree - i use router speed controls on all my lights and they work beautifully. But it is a trial and error thing when it comes to lower-end dimmers (like household dimmers or my router speed controls) - some work smoothly and quietly, some don't. The high-end dimmer boards are fantastic, no sing at all in basically any fixture. And yes, HPL lamps are designed to be dimmed, where FRK are not recommended.
I have used lower end boards (both new and old) and they sing like CRAZY on basically any fixture that's not theatrical in nature. As for variacs - I still have a soft spot for them. When space/weight allows, I love em. |
February 18th, 2007, 09:32 PM | #35 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Springfield, Massachusetts
Posts: 63
|
From my experience, creating "sculptural" light with a fog machine is possible but inconvient since the hang time is so short. I rented a hazer for one week, $150 a week, and never went back. Don't even bother with dry ice machines.
Source 4's are great, but I wouldn't say they're the best for shooting on location. -Alex |
February 18th, 2007, 09:58 PM | #36 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
People have mentioned a lot of things in this thread, except one important point:
If you want to illuminate a particulate in the air (smoke, water spray, etc), you generally need to backlight it. It doesn't always have to be a true backlight, but the light needs to be more pointing towards the lens than away.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
February 18th, 2007, 10:47 PM | #37 | ||
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,797
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
February 19th, 2007, 03:38 AM | #38 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Manalapan, NJ 07726
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Nate, you explained why more clearly. But you want to light snow from the front.
__________________
To capture an image, any camera needs a certain amount of illumination for proper exposure. Then start taking light away. |
|
| ||||||
|
|