|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 1st, 2003, 03:38 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 390
|
I think Hugh's talking about calibrating an external monitor to use instead of an on-camera LCD.
|
November 1st, 2003, 12:38 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
Alex
There is no on camera LCD just the 180k viewfinder. There's only so much that you can expect from a .7 inch LCD viewfinder , that's why people use a production monitor. |
November 2nd, 2003, 09:25 PM | #18 |
Great DV dot com
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 78
|
Alex, you cannot calibrate the LCD flipout monitor on prosumer cameras, and LCD monitors have different gamma than a real CRT monitor. You should not make critical lighting judgments based on a flip-out LCD.
Actually, though the procedure described in Graff's article is the correct procedure, it doesn't QUITE work for prosumer cameras, which do not add setup. The SMPTE bars are intended to work with setup (pedestal) added. The XL1s, GL2, etc. do not add setup to the output signal and display black as 0 IRE rather than 7.5 IRE. A wrist slap all round. To make matters worse, Sony added a setup control on the VX2000, but did it the wrong way -- recording the setup to tape rather than adding it to analog otuput. Haven't ahd a chance to see if they fixed this on the new version. A "fudge" for calibrating monitors with non-setup camcorders is at: http://www.greatdv.com/video/smptebars2.htm Hugh, I don't understand why you don't calibrate the color. It ain't that hard and you can run into silly problems if it's off to far.
__________________
John Jackman www.johnjackman.com |
November 2nd, 2003, 10:07 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
Nice site John. Loads of good reading.
I've bookmarked it and included it in my sites for newbies file. |
November 3rd, 2003, 09:24 AM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 202
|
I didn't think you could (with accuracy), that's why I asked for clarification. The attachable 4 inch LCDs seem to be growing in popularity, I thought maybe this is what he was using. I made a big assumption, oops!
|
November 7th, 2003, 07:34 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 112
|
Well, you guys convinced me to buy a pro monitor and not rely on my lcd. There goes another $1500 ... for a Sony PVM-8045Q.
|
November 9th, 2003, 12:30 AM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 304
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Marc Young : Well, you guys convinced me to buy a pro monitor and not rely on my lcd. There goes another $1500 ... for a Sony PVM-8045Q. -->>>
Great little monitor. You'll be happy with it. |
November 9th, 2003, 02:52 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
|
Is it safe to by an 8045 now? Don't you need an 8045QD with SDI? And will these work with the rumored HDV mini-cams (XL2 elsewhere on this site).
I recently shot with an SDX900 and the video viewed as SDI was different than the video viewed through the monitor port. |
November 9th, 2003, 06:00 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 206
|
Hi Chris,
I agree with the consensus that a monitor is the best referance for video lighting. But, I use a Sekonic L-398M Studio Deluxe II - Analog Incident and Reflected Light Meter to check for drops in level on large sets. I'll use it as a final confirmation to check where levels change on a set. Camera zebra pattens are useful for judging exposure on a given frame, but when a large area must be set checked, and you have talent working a stage where the director wants a uniform light over a large area, a meter is the best choice for the final check imho. Best, John Hartney werks.tv Elgin, Illinois 847.608.1357 |
November 9th, 2003, 09:01 PM | #25 |
Great DV dot com
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 78
|
<<<-- Originally posted by David Ziegelheim : I recently shot with an SDX900 and the video viewed as SDI was different than the video viewed through the monitor port. -->>>
No setup.
__________________
John Jackman www.johnjackman.com |
November 15th, 2003, 10:57 PM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Bergen
Posts: 170
|
LCD question
When I look through my LCD color viewfinders I always get at least some zebra lines, specially if the actor is waring a white shirt. Should I try to underexpose these areas or zebra on some bright areas should be acceptable?
__________________
Alain |
November 17th, 2003, 08:39 PM | #27 |
Great DV dot com
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 78
|
You are better off underexposing slightly.
__________________
John Jackman www.johnjackman.com |
November 18th, 2003, 01:37 PM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Bergen
Posts: 170
|
I'll go for the FT 5.6 and try to level the light accordingly.
__________________
Alain |
November 18th, 2003, 09:24 PM | #29 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 19
|
I'm new at this so bear with me.
Wouldn't it make sense for a DV to be able to use color correction from your NLE, for example Adobe rbg? Plug your monitor into your NLE and get it corrected to something standardized. This is a big stretch. How about connecting the monitor to a pc/mac and have some software look at your monitor while you are viewing footage. It would show color bars, right? This might be the case of a newbie stretching too far for a solution that can be handled easier somehow. |
November 18th, 2003, 10:03 PM | #30 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
I'm not sure what you're trying to solve. There are hardware calibrators for monitors. They are fairly expensive, so most editors use SMPTE color bars to calibrate NTSC monitors.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
| ||||||
|
|