|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 16th, 2007, 10:17 AM | #76 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old Europe (a.k.a. Germany)
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
Thanks. |
|
March 16th, 2007, 12:13 PM | #77 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hungary / Europe
Posts: 128
|
watch impress review
__________________
Robert Batta my stock video portfolio : https://www.pond5.com/artist/skysuta Pond5 – the world’s first web-based stock footage marketplace – |
March 18th, 2007, 02:09 PM | #78 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
Hey wait a minute...i downloaded this 172 gb file what this is ??? look at the faces of people in this footage . It is grainy ALL OVER THE PLACE !!!! Are u sure this is High Definition shot with the TX1 ? Because i don't call this HD quality at all even with my 2 years old SD camcorder Sony M1 , indoor shots are better quality !!!! i was VERY interested in buying the TX1 but after seeing this video, i think i'll pass this is a SHAME, and if CANON wants to sell this device, they should avoid the diffusion of such videos online !!! THIS IS A STOPPER. arrgh !! |
|
March 18th, 2007, 02:15 PM | #79 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 68
|
WOW was watching this video again, this is worse than VHS !! and i dont exagerate
on that site all the outdoor scenes are nice : http://www.google.com/translate?u=ht...&hl=hu&ie=UTF8 its funny to see that all outdoor videos shot in perfect condition with a tripod on that japanese site are ideal and all perfect...then when u watch a video shot in real condition, with people moving as in real life (so the 172 gb video in previous post) u see how different the result is !! instructive |
March 18th, 2007, 05:30 PM | #80 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old Europe (a.k.a. Germany)
Posts: 33
|
|
March 18th, 2007, 05:36 PM | #81 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Unfortunately, the definition of HD has *nothing* to do with image quality. It is only an image size; referring to resolutions above 480i. Quality has nothing to do with HD (perhaps it should; but by definition it does not).
|
March 19th, 2007, 10:25 AM | #82 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
yeah but judging by the video , the scene takes place in a well-lit ballroom, which is not exactly what i call "low light" conditions again my 2 years old Standard Definition camcorder (Sony M1) takes better videos than this in same conditions that's why i was shocked !! |
|
March 19th, 2007, 05:01 PM | #83 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old Europe (a.k.a. Germany)
Posts: 33
|
Not actually TX1 footage, but footage of the TX1. Might give you a better impression of the size and handling of the TX1.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bnyC7aHPvUk |
March 27th, 2007, 03:05 AM | #84 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 45
|
So, Canon HV10 is light years ahead of Canon TX1 in regard of video quality?
Though, it might be in reverse for image quality... |
March 30th, 2007, 11:14 AM | #85 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 34
|
any new updates on the tx1?
|
| ||||||
|
|