|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 21st, 2008, 11:46 AM | #16 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
I think Nikon has a huge opening here for there next model(s), especially is they decide to make something classified as a video camera that shoots great stills, as you are right, they have no market at all to protect.
|
September 21st, 2008, 05:42 PM | #17 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
Frankly, I would opt for the the predecessor with the lower megapixel count because it has even higher frame rate capabilities. I'm talking motion analysis here. regards, -gb- |
|
September 21st, 2008, 05:56 PM | #18 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
For motion analysis, sure, but except for Mythbusters (greatest show on television), golfers and hobbyists, it still seems like a gimmick until it can shoot at least SD rez at reasonably fast frame rates.
|
September 21st, 2008, 10:43 PM | #19 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
| ||||||
|
|