|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 23rd, 2008, 02:50 PM
|
#16 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 126
|
Read the specifications too quick. HD is at 60 frames per second, so I guess that means 60i.
Patrick |
|
|
|
January 23rd, 2008, 02:53 PM
|
#17 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 126
|
fields not frames, doh.
Patrick |
|
|
|
|
January 25th, 2008, 05:02 AM
|
#18 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Country, UK
Posts: 141
|
I used to like reading Stephen van Vuuren’s experiments shooting around 3 fps stills and using software interpolation to get back to 24 fps for experimental short films with a distinctive look. I bet he’d be interested in this camera! I wonder if the 60 frame buffer is a fixed number, or could you use a smaller frame size and accumulate more than 60 frames? Shutter life has been an issue with people using DSLRs for animation -- would this camera fail after a few weeks if you keep on shooting an astronomical number of stills?
|
|
|
|
|
January 25th, 2008, 10:26 AM
|
#19 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 463
|
thanks for the link - I love the idea of doing hi-speed recording.
BUT, I don't think it's 1080p, but 1080i (big difference in data) 720p would be more useful for most applications. quote: 1920 × 1080 (FHD HQ/FHD Normal, 60 fields per second), 1280 × 720 (HD LP, 30 fps)
__________________
Sean Adair - NYC - www.adairproductions.com JVC GY-HM-700 with 17x5 lens, MacPro 3.2ghz 8-core, 18gb. (JVC HD200 4 sale soon) |
|
|
|
|
January 25th, 2008, 10:33 AM
|
#20 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 463
|
sorry patrick - you caught yourself while I was checking data on the site!
At high speeds I'm sure it is only using the electronic shutter, so no wear - the mechanical shutter is probably only for still frames (up to burst mode ?). It's just frustratingly not adequate for any pro use. If it could do SD (640x480) at over 120fps, I'd start to think of applications for it, but the lo resolutions would only be useable in real projects as composited elements - which is really limiting. The burst mode IS possible to do things with, but only a little gap between my current 720 60p HD video and 7fps DSLR. These both allow much longer recording...
__________________
Sean Adair - NYC - www.adairproductions.com JVC GY-HM-700 with 17x5 lens, MacPro 3.2ghz 8-core, 18gb. (JVC HD200 4 sale soon) Last edited by Sean Adair; January 25th, 2008 at 10:40 AM. Reason: instead of posting 3x! |
|
|
|
|
January 26th, 2008, 12:09 AM
|
#21 | |
|
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
I am (but it's now actually "was") interested in this camera. If you dig deeply it's simply has 60 shot buffer at 6 megapixels. You can take those 60 shots at 60 fps and that gives you one second takes. If you want a longer takes, you've only got 60 frames. So a 12 second shot gets you only 5 fps, 20 second shot, only 3fps. So, it's of no use to me. If they have a later model that has a 200 or 300 full resolution buffer, that might interesting. I am currently in pre-production on a 4 minute or so short that will be shot with a Pentax K10d (all I could afford) that will shoot at steady 3fps at 10 megapixel until the buffer is full. I can get 1-2 minute takes depending on memory card. Of course, D300, A700 etc shoot at near 5fps until full but simply can't afford them yet. It's called "Last (Memories of Blue)" and will serve as a promotional/test piece for my IMAX film. |
|
|
|
|
|
March 24th, 2008, 12:22 PM
|
#22 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san miguel allende , gto , mexico
Posts: 644
|
casio ex-f1
|
|
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 03:54 PM
|
#23 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somerville, NJ
Posts: 304
|
Nice to hear. I wonder when we'll actually see these in stores.
|
|
|
|
|
March 28th, 2008, 07:36 PM
|
#24 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Woodbury, New Jersey
Posts: 30
|
I wondered why the pictures were so ridiculously clean, then realized they were lacking strongly in real detail. Talk about NR! With the full res burst being limited to one second of shots, and the 1080 video being interlaced, I'm afraid that it just doesn't seem to be as cool as all the hype. Still really neat though, especially for the high frame rates.
|
|
|
|
|
March 29th, 2008, 09:54 PM
|
#25 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
The 3rd post has a couple of samples.
http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...99&forum_id=14 -EDIT- I guess you’ll have to wait if you want to download the second native file because Rapidshare has issues with one of its servers. |
|
|
|
|
March 30th, 2008, 09:03 PM
|
#26 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Here are a couple of 300 frames per second clips:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Asb1kDFSu0Q http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lyMxymQEPk You’ll find many other examples on YouTube. |
|
|
|
|
March 31st, 2008, 07:24 PM
|
#27 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san miguel allende , gto , mexico
Posts: 644
|
Darn Paulo - that looks real cool to me - I think I want one/k
|
|
|
|
|
April 1st, 2008, 06:14 AM
|
#28 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germany, near munich
Posts: 14
|
Hello, look at
http://videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=5996 there ar many RAW-Clips, Image sequences and .MOV files. |
|
|
|
|
April 2nd, 2008, 11:04 PM
|
#29 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Robert Schiebel,
Thanks for that link. Here is the Watch.Impress review. Original Japanese: http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/do...2/zooma352.htm English Translated: http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...2fzooma352.htm |
|
|
|
|
September 30th, 2008, 08:09 PM
|
#30 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
Posts: 1,418
|
The video quality at full HD is looking very impressive- anyone here using one- opinions, impressions?
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
