|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 3rd, 2006, 04:29 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San jose CA
Posts: 5
|
HVX200 1080P being released next month ?
Hi All from Silicon Valley .
I just spoke to a reliable source who heard from a panasonic rep at NAB that a HVX200 upgraded model will be shipping next month . This model will be capable of 1080p and additional shutter speeds as well as menu functions which will allow one to record to the P2 adapters at various speeds . Has anoyne else heard such news ? |
May 3rd, 2006, 04:49 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
What you speak of is a FIRMWARE upgrade that many are anticipating. The current HVX can do 1080p FYI, even though the CCDs are native 960X540...
ash =o) |
May 3rd, 2006, 06:00 PM | #4 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
I thought it was 1080I so it would be 48I and 60I, and then if you choose to shoot 24, or 30 it combines the interlaced material into a Progressive frame. |
|
May 3rd, 2006, 06:07 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 117
|
Nope, 1080p out of CCD's with a far smaller res, the magic of pixel shifting!
__________________
Ainslie Davies - www.dualityproductions.com |
May 3rd, 2006, 08:03 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 132
|
Hardly magic -- anyone who has read Walter Graff's comparison of the HVX200 and the JVC HD100 can see how soft the pixel shift magic 540 pixels are even in 720P mode.
I haven't read any official word, but it sounds to me like Panasonic had a bunch of killer chips for a SD DVX200 and decided, hell, we can pass it off as HD. That said, I will be most likely be purchasing one in the near future. ;-) mg |
May 3rd, 2006, 09:05 PM | #7 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San jose CA
Posts: 5
|
HVX200 1080P being released next month ?
Quote:
this article below may shed some light: http://www.technologyevangelist.com/...tional_in.html |
|
May 4th, 2006, 12:05 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
So just to clarify, is this firmware update going to be available for the cameras that are already out? Can it be updated by the users over 1394 or SD card, or will we have to send the cameras in? I'd love to hear Jan comment on this...
__________________
Matt Irwin DP / matt.irwincine.com |
|
May 4th, 2006, 12:21 AM | #9 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
May 4th, 2006, 12:43 AM | #10 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
I have no inside info on this, but I can say with a great degree of assurance that the whole premise of this thread (a new 1080p model etc) is without any factual basis. Especially since the current version *is* a 1080p model...
There is simply no way, on this planet or any other, that they're going to replace this camera this soon. The current model will stay current for at least this full year. They cannot keep up with demand as-is, and as long as it's selling faster than they can make it, they will continue to produce the current model. A firmware upgrade is possible, of course -- hopefully one that will unlock all the wonderful frame rates (every even frame rate from 2 to 60 is in there already, just haven't all been tested and certified so using them is at your own risk) but hopefully they've had time to verify and certify more and will unlock them. It's unknown what other features or capabilities a firmware update may be possible of; at NAB I was able to fill the engineers' heads with about two dozen different requests, but frankly I don't know which of them may even be possible in a simple firmware update, and which ones would require new hardware to implement. As far as this part: Quote:
|
|
May 4th, 2006, 06:14 AM | #11 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,195
|
Quote:
|
|
May 4th, 2006, 12:44 PM | #12 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Yes, the XL1s uses the same CCDs as the original XL1.
|
May 4th, 2006, 01:18 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
People are obsessed with resolution... once you get to a certain level it just doesnt become THE factor. The actual pixel count and what you ultimately see can be very very different. I love the XL2, physically the PAL version actually has more pixels on the CCD than the HVX but nobody in their right mind would say the XL2 is sharper... How you get there is something people can argue about while the rest of us are out making money =o)
ash =o) |
May 4th, 2006, 07:29 PM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Burnaby & Maple Ridge BC
Posts: 289
|
Quote:
__________________
Earl R. Thurston, Stargate Connections Inc. Made with GY-HD100: The Container Adventures: The Rescue |
|
May 4th, 2006, 09:29 PM | #15 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
I guess as someone who shoots with this camera I must be an absolute idiot because I have never seen 1080p as an option on this camera. 1080i and that's as high as my options go. Please tell me where the selection in my menu is where I can choose 1080p. I see plenty of 1080i but no 1080p. I can't wait to find this option on the camera. David
__________________
www.motivitypictures.com |
|
| ||||||
|
|