|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 12th, 2006, 04:51 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milan/Italy
Posts: 63
|
FW drive OTG dvcpro50
Hi all.
Since to me high def from HVX will be unusefull for a while, I have a couple of questions regarding dvcpro50: Regardless of the (obviously interesting) plus coming from 4:2:2 scheme, lighter compression, 16/9 nativeness, and minus coming from eventual lower sensitivity, will be there some kind of difference in terms of resolved lines from a DVX? In other terms, will the 940x540 (+pixel shift) imager on the HVX gives advantage about perceived resolution when recording SD? Anybody knows if copying dvcpro50 files OTG on a FW selfpowered drive will take longer times over 720 or 1080 ones? How long will take with veryfying to download an 8gb card? Thanks Alvise |
|
|
|
April 12th, 2006, 05:02 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 198
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13th, 2006, 02:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milan/Italy
Posts: 63
|
Because broadcast in Europe is pretty far from permitting a true complete HD workflow. Right now I would have to downconvert, so still better to use better SD cameras than HD 1/3 ones. Also right now Apple FCP doesn't support 720p50 and my monitor isn't HD capable (as so many "hd ready" tv set are).
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
