|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 18th, 2006, 09:57 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 327
|
OHMYGOD, YOU'RE NOT SHOOTING IN A NUCLEAR FACILITY ARE YOU????
BTW, the thing with Quicktime Pro is that it will read DVCProHD files, and it will allow you to export in any Quicktime codec you have, including DVCProHD. It just won't allow you to live capture from firewire. |
January 18th, 2006, 10:08 PM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
David Last edited by David M. Payne; January 19th, 2006 at 12:35 AM. |
|
January 19th, 2006, 12:32 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 104
|
Well, there is a sort-of solution, if I understand software distribution practices correctly:
Install FCP on a hard drive, and plug that drive into whatever machine you happen to be using at any given moment. That way, FCP only "exists" on one machine at a time. Now, technically, you may continuously install the software on new machines as long as you delete it on the other machines. Many contracts (or interpretations) loosen this to mean "you can install on more than one machine, as long as you never RUN it on more than one machine at a time", since, technically, you could achieve the same effect by deinstalling and reinstalling. This might work for you if you don't plan to use the laptops simultaneously. -Barry |
January 19th, 2006, 12:40 AM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
David |
|
January 19th, 2006, 11:22 AM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
it may be installed only on one machine at one time. it doesn't say you can install multiple times on multiple machines, but use it only on one machine at a time. |
|
January 19th, 2006, 12:34 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 81
|
Only FCP will work with DVCPRO HD and 24p to capture from the camera according to the chart on the Apple web site.
David Last edited by David M. Payne; January 19th, 2006 at 04:56 PM. |
January 19th, 2006, 03:08 PM | #22 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
|
|
January 22nd, 2006, 11:27 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san miguel allende , gto , mexico
Posts: 644
|
cheap solution - buy another copy off ebay- jaywalking is illegal but you should still look both ways. A ticket is nothing compared to getting wacked by 3 tons of steel.Kurth
|
January 22nd, 2006, 02:07 PM | #24 |
Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2
|
Careful not to spend a dollar to save a dime.
I did a pretty large scale 24P DV shoot (DVX100) a while back and since it made me nervous to put a ton of labor costs onto a $6 cassette I bought a portable DV deck to connect via firewire so I would have a back-up of all the shots. Fortunately, I didn't need the back-ups, but I did learn just how un-"production-friendly" a firewire connection really is - it would frequently fall out or come loose (despite the gaffers tape). The time I lost was the small price I was going to have to pay to make sure I had a shot to edit with -- adding a day because a tape failed was not in the budget. My point is this: trying to tether two laptops to your cameras, while a seemingly cost-effective solution, is likely to cost you a lot of time, on top of what you might spend trying to make it work. If you can figure out a way to swing P2 cards you'll have greater flexibility/mobility with your cameras -- cameras that will start recording with the push of a button, as opposed to making sure FCP is capturing on two separate laptops. I've seen productions where someone comes up with a "half-price" solution, only to have it work half of the time and they wind up spending more than if they had gone with a more traditional approach. Making a movie is hard enough -- a rigged recording solution, while feasible may prove disastrous.
And for something totally different -- I thought I heard that FireStore has a solution for the HVX, of course this solution is not inexpensive, but it may be more cost-effective than P2 cards. Best of luck -- and thanks for having the integrity not to abuse FCP's software license. |
January 22nd, 2006, 09:55 PM | #25 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
As for not abusing the FCP software license, after over $9,500.00 worth of Apples (A G5 Quad and 2 G4's) and the FCP software as well as some other software and computer upgrades, I'm pretty sure Apple is isn't feeling too abused by me. As I said there are always 3rd party solutions and workarounds that are fair to all parties involved, and I have some time anyway. Who knows perhaps apple will upgrade "QuickTime Pro" to a really "Pro" app. That way they can't be accused of ripping people off by offering a "Pro" product that isn't up to "Pro" standards, right? After all Apple can easily incorporate the ability to capture DVCPRO HD from a camera into QuickTime Pro, they already know the codec for it. (Memo to Steve Jobs: Hey Steve, do the right thing and help us small time Indie flick guys out and really up grade QT Pro so it will capture DVCPRO HD. After all it will funnel all that film shot in QT Pro into your computers and software, and its win-win baby, and you win both times to our one! ;) Your new pal, David M Payne.) David ;) Last edited by David M. Payne; January 23rd, 2006 at 08:22 PM. |
|
January 23rd, 2006, 11:29 AM | #26 |
Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2
|
QT has "Device Native" option
Hi David,
I was just sharing my experience with 4-pin firewire in a production environment to say that it's rather touchy. Unfortunately, someone hasn't devised a type of firewire connector that is as robust as BNC or XLR. As for QuickTime Pro, I did notice under the recording preferences you can choose "Device Native" under the quality option -- this may only go as far as the DV codec, I didn't find a definitive answer elsewhere online in my brief search. I know it goes without saying, but thoroughly test your workflow before you sink too much money in any one direction. Also realize that if it takes an extra 5 minutes every time you need to relocate the camera(s) to accommodate moving your laptop stations, you're easily loosing an hour or more a day, after 10 days of shooting, you've lost more than a day. You're probably not in a situation where you have to pay your crew over-time, but that kind of productivity loss will affect morale. -David |
January 23rd, 2006, 11:47 PM | #27 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
David |
|
| ||||||
|
|