December 29th, 2005, 04:37 PM | #121 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 40
|
I'd also like to see an Operating Instructions manual (PDF) posted on Panasonic's website for the HVX200. Please post it now that the camera is shipping. :)
|
December 29th, 2005, 04:40 PM | #122 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
great line up now for lower end HD Sony FX1/Z1 if you're on a budget and don't mind interlace JVC if you're a filmmaker on a budget who knows how to operate a Camera correctly Canon if you need 1080 and better glass on the front. HVX if you don't mind the fixed lens but want ALL those framerate options and a good in camera filmlook. A bit simplistic I know, but basically it's all good news! Personally it's the Canon AND the HVX for us - best of both worlds. |
|
December 29th, 2005, 05:13 PM | #123 | |
Panasonic Broadcast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Secaucus, NJ 07094
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Am working on it. Right now the only version I have is 20MBs, too big to email and too large for a download. So hopefully soon the publications guys will send it to me. Best, Jan
__________________
Jan Crittenden Livingston Panasonic Solutions Company, Product Manager for 3D and Handheld Cameras |
|
December 29th, 2005, 05:32 PM | #124 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
|
too big for email, but not too big for hosting, JAN...
plz do so, it would be very useful and even could help some of us making the choice of buying the camera, since the manuals explain a lot of doubts |
December 29th, 2005, 05:45 PM | #125 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 40
|
I second that Alex. I have cable modem access, so it would probably take less than a minute to download. :: wink :: wink :: :D
This has been the most anticipated release in a long time in my view. I'd like to poke around the manual to familiarize myself with the "ins and outs" of this wonderous camera. |
December 29th, 2005, 06:31 PM | #126 | ||||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
||||
December 29th, 2005, 06:36 PM | #127 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Burnaby & Maple Ridge BC
Posts: 289
|
Quote:
|
|
December 29th, 2005, 06:55 PM | #128 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
Jan....
How is 20mbs to big for download, maybe 6 years ago. Kaku is pushing out way larger files, you telling me the huge Panasonic has bandwidth issue. hhhmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quote:
|
|
December 29th, 2005, 06:57 PM | #129 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Snellville, Georgia
Posts: 614
|
Quote:
|
|
December 29th, 2005, 07:05 PM | #130 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Not to mention that *MOST* people out there (ie: their potential customers) don't have the bandwidth and/or the desire to download a 20MB file. It's a users' guide... It should be a B&W PDF, probably about 1 to 4 MB in size and the closer to 1~2MB the better.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
December 29th, 2005, 07:07 PM | #131 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
wmv files anyone?
|
December 29th, 2005, 07:53 PM | #132 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,214
|
Can you upload an MXF file directly off the card? or are one of the zip files on the FTP already an MXF?
thanks amigo... |
December 29th, 2005, 07:58 PM | #133 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 40
|
The ZIP files currently contain Quicktime files, which won't play on Windows, but if you have a MAC, you might be in business if you have the DVCPRO-HD codec... Jan mentioned ealier in this post that the MXF files can be copied directly off the card from the CONTENT folder. It'd be great if someone posts the RAW MXF files.
|
December 29th, 2005, 08:03 PM | #134 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
It does the same thing with 1080; instead of reporting the proper size it reports a full 1920x1080. Not ideal. And then, on a reasonably fast system, you'll find that the Avid codec running through the Quicktime interface in Vegas is quite pokey. Around 4 frames per second. A proper native implementation should be playing back four or five streams in full-screen in realtime. Overall the workaround is nowhere near a satisfactory solution. It is better than nothing, that's for sure; but it's not what we need. Not yet, at least. |
|
December 29th, 2005, 08:23 PM | #135 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
Posts: 1,382
|
I'm up. Jeez, it's after 11:15am.
Man, too many posts to read up...:) |
| ||||||
|
|