|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 6th, 2005, 04:44 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16
|
Cheap flash memory.
How come flash memory is available relatively cheaply when connected to a USB port yet the P2 is so hugely expensive? Here is an interesting site:
http://www.911usb.net/products_new.p...4090112df2252f 4 Gigs is costing only $298! I know this doesn't fit the P2 slot, but what about someone out there making an adapter? Bruce |
December 6th, 2005, 06:50 PM | #2 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Cheap memory is cheaper, but it's of no use because it's not fast enough. Even "high speed" cards aren't fast enough; they max out at 9 or 10 megabytes per second, and DVCPRO-HD needs around 13 megabytes per second. Then you have to factor in that a P2 card is six times faster than realtime when transferring files. It's capable of 640 megabits per second (around 80 megabytes per second), so transferring files in the edit suite will be dramatically faster off a P2 card than it would be off of even the fastest fastest fastest compactflash or SD card. |
|
December 7th, 2005, 11:02 AM | #3 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Even lower speed 120X SD chips should still provide more than enough bandwidth for DVCPROHD. Each SD chip in a P2 card must be able to sustain a write speed of 3.125MB/sec (12.5Mbps) in order to accommodate DVCPROHD. The P2 implementation uses 4 separate SD chips on a 32bit, interleaved, quad-channel controller. Thus it's the combined bandwidth of all the SD memory in the card and none of the individual chips need to be capable of the full bandwidth needed. Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
||
December 7th, 2005, 10:29 PM | #4 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Last time I looked at SD cards, Sandisk's Ultra II was advertised at a sustained write speed of 9 or 10 megabytes per second, and only the Extreme III was listed with a higher speed, that being a sustained 20 megabytes per second. If there are other, faster options out there, that's excellent!
P2 card pricing has fallen quite a bit, too. Whereas the last time a price was quoted for a 4gb card it was $1750, the new pricing is $650. And that's retail; "street" price still remains to be seen. But seeing as a Sandisk Extreme III 4gb CompactFlash card carries a retail price of $599, and a 4gb P2 card is 4x as fast and costs $50 more, I'd say the pricing looks reasonable for what it is, right? |
December 8th, 2005, 12:59 AM | #5 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
My whole point with the previous post was that even with this super fast SD memory out now, it's not necessary for P2 to work and accommodate DVCPRO100. A single Sandisk Extreme III is more than capable of the full speed required (20MBytes = 160Mbps). But like I said, P2 doesn't work that way... It's 4 individual SD chips in a quad-channel array, much like a RAID0 stripe set of hard drives. Each SD card only needs to sustain a 3.125MByte/sec write speed to accommodate DVCPRO at 100Mbps. Most of the generic SD chips you can buy for less than $40 per 1GB will meet that criteria -- although, zero-defect is a whole other matter and that will cause the price to go up a bit once again. Quote:
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
||
December 8th, 2005, 01:01 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 36
|
One thought: I can see the need for P2 when recording DVCPROHD at 100Mbps, but what about DVCPRO50 and 25? Why do they need P2-type speed?
And taking that further, why not have a DVCPRO-HD 50Mbps standard? Still twice the data of HDV, at 720p it would be pretty darn good. And also not need as fast card.. (sorry if this has been suggested before) |
December 8th, 2005, 05:12 PM | #7 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
A better way to put it is that a single SD chip on it's own can't cope with DVCPRO100 and would probably struggle with 50Mbps in most cases. But interleave 4 of them together, you get 4X the capacity and nearly 4X the speed with a nearly linear progression in price. Quote:
720p @ 24fps only requires a 40Mbps data stream and does not use the full 100Mbps bandwidth. 720p @ 30fps requires 50Mbps. Recording to P2 allows only active frames to be stored, so your frame rate in 720p will have some degree of effect on the data rate of what you're recording. You can recorde about 13.5 minutes of 720p24 on a 4GB P2 card. If you record 720p @ the 60fps max, it will require the full 100Mbps of the DVCPROHD format. 1080 line mode in DVCPROHD is *always* recorded at 1080i60 @ 100Mbps. It supports 24p, 24pA and 30p the same way the DVX100 does by internally handling a true 24p stream, but encoding it to fit within the 1080i format standard. This is a limitation of the DVCPROHD standard, not the camera as Panasonic didn't want to break compatibility with existing DVCPROHD systems. Besides, as we have all seen with the DVX100, this method of delivering 24 or 30 progressive frames/sec over an interlaced standard works beautifully.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
||
| ||||||
|
|