|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 13th, 2005, 09:49 AM | #31 |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
Hopefully. But remember, I'm fussy. I do think that DVCproHD is too compressed, but from my experience, it's less visually compressed than HDV, but that's comparing Varicam to HDV. Hopefully the same or similar improvements will be seen with the HVX over the HDV. However, I still think that the SDX900 (from what I've seen), gives you the best image from a Panasonic camera, HD or not!
Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
November 13th, 2005, 11:25 AM | #32 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
|
|
November 13th, 2005, 01:31 PM | #33 |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
I have no idea. And I don't know what your priorities in a camera are. From the images I've seen the best affordable DV camera is the DVX100. If you want real widescreen, the XL2 or the Sony HDV in DV mode are your options.
Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
November 13th, 2005, 03:41 PM | #34 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
I'm still debating how I want to archive my HDV footage, but hopefully next year's HD DVD options will help with that. |
|
November 13th, 2005, 03:45 PM | #35 |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
The BBC primarily use the Z1 as a high quality widescreen SD DV camera.
Downsampling HDV to uncompressed SD should look better than HDV downsampled to DV (as long as you avoid MPEG2 provoking situations) or shot as DV. Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
| ||||||
|
|