|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#31 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 356
|
Re: AC160 to HPX250: I'm Tempted
Yeah I know, I know:)
I think I wont sell it. It still has good use for web videos and press conferences where there's lot's of flashes going off (also for web). As for the sharpening the HPX171 it's best to avoid coring, set the detail in camera off then remove noise in post and the sharpen. To get back to the original topic. If I already had an AC160 all that I would do is buy a Ninja 2 and use that for times when a better codec is needed... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|