|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 22nd, 2005, 08:25 AM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 57
|
Won't happen, if the data's uncompressed. You can record it to disk, but it won't be reasonably priced or portable, it'd be about $15,000worth of a desktop tower with an 8-hard-disk RAID.[/QUOTE]
This is what I don't understand. If the HVX writes DVCproHD to flash cards (P2s) why can't it do it to a big hard disk? 100GB will always give you more air than 8GB when you are shooting. |
September 22nd, 2005, 08:31 AM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
is this a fact? How do you know? |
|
September 22nd, 2005, 09:32 AM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
What has been confirmed is that Focus Enhancements, the folks who
make the DV Firestore solution are WORKING on it. A solution that can record 100mbps has *not* been delivered and is not due (to be shown or delivered, who knows?) until NAB in April.
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
September 22nd, 2005, 09:33 AM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
A colleague of mine was able to attend NAB, and he was telling me how the P2 slots in the HVX were designed to be modular in that other devices could be made into a p2 form (like an RF transmitter). If that's true, wouldn't it be possible to make a p2-to-firewire(400/800) adapter? You know, like a card with a wire coming out the back? Or for that matter, maybe SDI...
__________________
Matt Irwin DP / matt.irwincine.com |
|
September 22nd, 2005, 09:55 AM | #20 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
|
|
September 22nd, 2005, 10:01 AM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
FW800 or SDI on the HVX to get DVCproHD out? Would be just dandy. Might Panasonic find this a threat to selling lots of P2 cards? |
|
September 22nd, 2005, 02:51 PM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
|
-
Panasonic is a Business (read: must make money) and i think there is a limit of what they are willing to do for low-budget users.
And this limit is: competition. For now, the HVX is quite alone. The Canon H1 is 3000$ more. However, i don't know what "street price" would be for both |
September 22nd, 2005, 04:47 PM | #23 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York City, NY
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release...5565&tsource=3 |
|
September 22nd, 2005, 05:00 PM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 57
|
Perfect. That's it. Seems like THE way to go to me. It will avoid running back and forth from camera to disks all day long.
|
September 23rd, 2005, 10:11 AM | #25 | |
Panasonic Broadcast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Secaucus, NJ 07094
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
As far as it not being switchable between PAL and NTSC, there are 27 formats in the camera that would have to be redesigned to switch to 24 formats in the PAL camera due to frequencies and format adoption, ie 1080/50i-720/50P. Not to say that it couldn't be done but I am not willing to wait another 2 years while they figure out how. I mean really, we, the figurative we, have been doing 24P/25P for as long as I can remember and interlace before that. Many of the DV/DVCAM movies that were released here not that long ago were all done in PAL, so what is the big deal. If that is what you need to do then do it. Willam Wenders, Land of Plenty released here, US, looked marvelous, shot on 25P dropped to 24P. You all make it sound as if it doen't happen in the camera it is not good. Think again. Best, Jan
__________________
Jan Crittenden Livingston Panasonic Solutions Company, Product Manager for 3D and Handheld Cameras |
|
September 23rd, 2005, 10:45 AM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 57
|
We've been always trying to imitate film with video. Now that it's possible, I would always shoot 24p as if it was film, edit and care about PAL-NTSC when its time to deliver master copies, not before.
|
September 23rd, 2005, 12:44 PM | #27 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10
|
I own a xl-2 camera and as a reply to the starting- topic I have to say that filming with the standart zoom objective and the standart viefinder is not really possible, becouse you canīt get focus "in time".
If you want to film in a more professional way you have to get the manual zoom objective and the black and white viefinder (for the xl-2). I think, as I have shot footage on the dx100 also, the greatest advantage of the new hvx200 is the manual zoom. And in case of the new XLh1, where, as far as I can see, the same zoom lens as on the xl2 is used, you have to extra invest for an manual zoom lens (around 2000 $). (But on the other hand, the hvx200 can not be upgraded with an black and white viewfinder.) The only advantage of the 20x Original Zoom Objective is (in my oppinion): I get a good DOF by zooming. And the 20x Zoom is a good tool for that (on the xl-2). |
September 23rd, 2005, 10:57 PM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 97
|
I think the major advantage of the HVX is the codec. Most people are really excited about the DVCPRO / DVCPRO HD codecs that this camera records to.
I think everyone on this board agrees that these codecs are superior to the HDV codecs in just about every bench mark (except for file size). But the question is, how much better? The CCD's, The DSP, the lens, all have their parts to play in the final image, the codec is just one part. I've cut two shows with HDV footage from the Sony Z1, and I agree with adam wilt that it "looks better than it has any right to." It's like trying to tell the difference between a photo comressed in .jpg or .png formats. One is better, but can your eye really see the difference? Both formats are compressed video, and while I believe that DVCPRO HD is a better codec, I will have to wait for this camera to be released and put through it's paces before I can say that it produces a better IMAGE. |
September 24th, 2005, 03:20 PM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Soest ,Holland
Posts: 307
|
When I read the specs Panasonic is saying : for extended on the spot recording, the P2 card with recorded data can be inserted into the AJPSC060G 'P2 store' external hard drive...which holds as much as 15 4-gb P2 cards
I think that's were you can leave all your data for storage...during shooting. |
September 25th, 2005, 10:54 AM | #30 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 117
|
I think the AJPSC060G 'P2 store' external hard drive works only with PCs and not MACs. Am I right?
|
| ||||||
|
|