|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 19th, 2009, 10:26 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 103
|
Hvx200b?
I've begun to look into a new camera purchase and the 200A has much to recommend. One concern I have is whether and when a successor might be introduced. Any opinions on when this might happen? (Also, not sure when the 200A was brought to market.)
Thanks
__________________
Ron Johnson Portland, OR |
October 19th, 2009, 02:09 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 220
|
Isn't the HPX170 the successor?
|
October 19th, 2009, 04:31 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
I will be surprised if there is ever an HVX200B, the technology has moved on. The 170 is basically the successor to the 200 along with the 200A. And to be honest, as much as I like my 170, the era of 960x540 imagers with pixel shifting is coming to a close, as is DVCPRO HD, the future of Panasonics medium to high end is obviously AVCINTRA.
Next camera in this price range will undoubtedly be full raster CMOS, AVCINTRA 100, will still use P2 cards and will be basically a lower end, fixed lens HPX300, I predict. The again, with the immense mania around DSLRs, and the possible introduction of Scarlet (if it ever comes out) maybe Panasonic will freak us all out by introducing something with the specs of the HPX3700 for $5k at NAB 2010, who knows? Dan |
October 22nd, 2009, 09:41 PM | #4 |
Better than Halle Berry
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 435
|
Exactly- the 170 is the update to the 200. Mainly because Panasonic opted rightfully to remove the DV deck entirely from the 200 configuration- thus 200B doesn't quite make sense because it's a major change. So yeah you'll likely never see a 200B...
Noah |
October 23rd, 2009, 11:21 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
I would hope Panasonic doesn’t waste their time developing an HVX200B. That tape drive adds extra bulk and weight which makes your shooting less stable especially if your not using any type of stabilizer.
|
October 24th, 2009, 04:20 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore, Rep of SINGAPORE
Posts: 749
|
Forget about getting the HVX202 - I went from that to a HPX172. The HVX202 is heavy (about 1kg heavier than HPX172) ... and the balance is way much better on HPX172.
|
| ||||||
|
|