|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 10th, 2005, 04:33 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 857
|
Move this whole Panny forum?
Chris,
Isn't it time to tuck this whole "Panasonic AG-HVX200 DVCPro HD/P2 Camcorder" forum under the HD section? It's just another HD cam. You don't have the Sony or JVC cams at the top of the Community home page. Shouldn't this cam's forum be placed in the HD sub-forum. Whether it's HDV or ProHD, it's HD related and should be grouped together to avoid cluttering the top page. And as of right now, its only vaporware. Besides, by virtue of location, it appears you're giving very preferential treatment to this cam over all others.
__________________
Fear No Weevil! |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2005, 08:02 PM
|
#2 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Good idea, in my opinion. They are all 1/3" chip HD "prosumer" type cameras, whether they record to HDV or to DCVPRO HD. Maybe they could all be lumped together and called something like Affordable HD, or HD for the Masses--oops, nope, 2-pop has that one. Somebody needs to come up with a word better than "prosumer," which is really a disgusting non-word.
|
|
|
|
|
May 10th, 2005, 08:24 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ashford, AL
Posts: 937
|
How about Cheapro? Or, AffordablePro. Or, BargainPro? Or, Blue Light Special Pro?
|
|
|
|
|
May 10th, 2005, 10:16 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 888
|
Quote:
Sounds like a good camera, but I think it was a bad marketing plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 06:33 AM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 857
|
Bob, I think it'll be a great cam that will meet the needs of a good number of folks. I think it and the JVC HD cam will start to stratify the lower end of the 'pro' ranks. And I have no doubt that Panny will come through, its not like it'll be vaporware forever, but its not like it'll be here tomorrow either.
Bill, the word 'prosumer' is so embedded in this field that I think we'll not see it replaced soon, especially by some of the really bad replacements Guy recommended. Sorry Guy. ;)
__________________
Fear No Weevil! |
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 06:41 AM
|
#6 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 704
|
And as of right now, its only vaporware.
...... Sounds like a good camera, but I think it was a bad marketing plan. It's still way too early to call this camera 'vaporware,' and in my opinion it's entirely unfair and premature. What makes it vaporware? The fact that it's not released yet? The term vaporware refers to a product which is announced, given a release date, and then fails to be released as promised. As of right now, this camera is following the same exact release and marketing path that the DVX did. Panasonic made the announcement, showed off a mockup, and gave a release date. So far they have stuck by everything they've said. If the fourth quarter of this year comes and goes with no HVX release, then you can call it vaporware. But as of right now, there is no reason to believe the camera will not be released as planned. It may be a long wait, but that doesn't mean it isn't going to happen, and defintely does not make it vaporware.
__________________
Luis Caffesse Pitch Productions Austin, Texas |
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 07:29 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 857
|
Quote:
I'll agree that 'vaporware' was a little harsh and the marketing release of this camera does not constitute the narrow definition of 'vaporware'. I retract that term as I firmly believe that Panny will release the cam on or very near the scheduled date. And I wish I had an extra 10k laying around about then. But...even if its not vaporware, it is just another High Definition acquisition camcorder. So why does it deserve to remain 'above the fold' while all the other equipment is nested two levels deeper? That's all I'm asking? Heck, the XL2 didn't even stay broken out for this long and we know Chris has been known to shoot a Canon (pun intended).
__________________
Fear No Weevil! |
|
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 10:47 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alexander, NC
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
--Ralph
__________________
--Ralph Roberts, CEO 1VIDeo / aBOOKS / Creativity, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 11:42 AM
|
#9 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 704
|
As of right now there is no "HD" section, there is the HDV section, but this camera doesn't shoot HDV. I assume this is why Chris hasn't moved the forum yet. Eventually it will find a home as he reorganizes things I would guess.
Why the hurry to move it anyhow?
__________________
Luis Caffesse Pitch Productions Austin, Texas |
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 02:58 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
The term "prosumer" assumes that in some way this camera is aimed at, or marketed to, the hobbyist or consumer. The HVX, Z1, and HD100 are Professional cameras; designed for and marketed to working pros. They are in a price range that would preclude almost all DV consumers from buying one. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 08:34 PM
|
#11 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Well, the reason it's up here at the top is because it's a forum without a home.
It will *not* be thrown into the HDV category... if I did that, nobody at Panasonic would ever speak to me again. P2 is not HDV. DVCPRO HD is not HDV. And so on. There will be some sort of reorganization of categories coming up pretty soon. One option is to throw all of the HD format boards in some sort of general HD category, but the term "prosumer" most definitely will not be part of the description. For now you guys are going to have to live with its current location, but it will indeed move once we can figure out the best to reorganize and order the forum categories. Thanks a bunch, |
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2005, 10:39 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 607
|
Quote:
HDV is and was designed as a "consumer" format. An expensive consumer product that is just good enough for professionals to get away with is considered "PROsumer", but I like Guy's suggestion of "Cheapro" better. And considering I can't find an HD TV for under $1000.00, these Cheapro cameras ARE well within the price range of almost any consumer in the HD market. Think about it, compare the price of a standard-def high end consumer camera, like the VX2000, vs a standard-def TV. Now do the same for HD-TV's and where would that leave the price range for a high end consumer or low end Professional HD video camera? I have a $400 TV (Sony WEGA) and a $4000 camera (the PD-170, the lowest end PRO camera, sorry the VX is considered a consumer camera even by Sony) so if I were to move to HD it would be safe to assume that if my TV cost (at least) $1000 my camera would cost $10K (like Panasonic's lowest end PRO camera, the HVX200) But my biggest worry is what's going to happen when nobody uses DV anymore? Can we still come here and visit? |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12th, 2005, 07:30 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 857
|
Quote:
__________________
Fear No Weevil! |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12th, 2005, 08:23 AM
|
#14 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Anyway, I agree though. The pricing of the HVX200, even including a couple 8GB P2 cards at the full extortionist MSRP price, is still not out of line if it delivers what Panny claims it will. And yes, it puts this camera right in line with the "prosumer" market segment that buys high-end HD/home theatre gear. I think calling the HVX200 a "prosumer" camcorder goes against Panny's marketing approach and it rubs a lot of pro video guys (who are trying to find ways to justify/afford it) the wrong way... But I think that when the dust settles and all the HVX200 purchases are tabulated (if that were possible), then that is exactly what this camcorder will be. There's a lot of "prosumer" types buying the DVX100, FX1 and even the Z1 because they're into expensive gadgets with more capabilities than the typical consumer palmcorder crap. You can bet that there will be a measurable percentage buying the HVX200 with a few P2 cards because they want a camcorder that shines on their new 60"+ HDTV and HDV doesn't appeal to them. I know several guys interested in the HVX200 because of the solid state recording alone and a few of them only do video (of any kind) as a hobby. On the other hand, I think it's really cool that someone can use a $3~$6K camcorder to earn a living as many people here do.
__________________
- Jeff Kilgroe - Applied Visual Technologies | DarkScience - www.darkscience.com |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12th, 2005, 08:29 AM
|
#15 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Well, let's just say that Panasonic doesn't appreciate comparisons with HDV.
Patrick is right though, this board needs to be moved, and it will be once we get things better organized around here. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
