|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 29th, 2005, 11:38 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa. Canada
Posts: 163
|
Capture confusion?
Hi Def, in the past, has generally been associated with faster drives, raid arrays and the fastest processors for any workable real time effects, etc. Now I am confused with the claims, and I don't doubt the authors of these claims, that DVC pro HD can be firewire captured on a laptop from the camera whilst filming. Oh, and now you can also play HD back on an ipod. A laptop will sustain 100mbps? Heck I thought the 5400rpms were taxed at DV's 25mbps! What am I missing? Also, these claims seem to contradict the panic over P2's managabilty, and, given the amount of incredulity expressed at HD on laptops and ipods, I know I'm not the only one that seems to be missing the boat here, so any breakdown of data rates and drive requirements for capture of DVC PRO HD would put a lot of minds at rest.
Thanks. |
April 29th, 2005, 06:09 PM | #2 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
In the past, Hi Def was edited uncompressed. Yes that meant RAID arrays, etc. You were dealing with about 170 megabytes per second.
With DVCPRO-HD, you now have desktop HD editing over firewire. Apple first introduced it in Final Cut Pro HD -- it's already out there, has been for -- how long, six months or a year? It's already available. You can run multiple streams of real-time high-def footage on an FCP-HD system. 100mbps equates to about 12.5 megabytes per second. Most 2.5" drives can easily sustain that data rate. 3.5" desktop drives are much faster, but laptop 2.5" drives can handle that with no sweat. The ipod test that they keep mentioning was a 720/24p data stream. That means 40mbps, not 100. The little 1.8" drives in ipods would be *very* taxed to try to sustain a 100mbps data stream, but 40 is within their capabilities. If you want to know what system specs it takes to edit DVCPRO-HD, just look at the system recommendations for FCP-HD or Avid Express HD. Those are two systems that are shipping today that can natively edit the format. |
April 29th, 2005, 07:28 PM | #3 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Howdy from Texas,
Quote:
|
|
April 30th, 2005, 12:43 AM | #4 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
|
then why isn't p2 overkill?
"100mbps equates to about 12.5 megabytes per second. Most 2.5" drives can easily sustain that data rate. 3.5" desktop drives are much faster, but laptop 2.5" drives can handle that with no sweat."
if the panasonic tops out out at 100Mbps in HD data output, why are the p2 cards needed at 640Mbps or even the p2s cards at 320Mbps? how can anyone not suspect panasonic of trying to profit unreasonably from overpriced p2 cards when a simple 5400rpm drive would capture 10 times the data fast enough at a fraction of the price? |
April 30th, 2005, 04:33 AM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
"why are the p2 cards needed at 640Mbps or even the p2s cards at 320Mbps?"
why?? well if theyre any slower, how long do u think it would take to transfer that across to ur workstation?? |
May 1st, 2005, 07:28 AM | #6 | |
Panasonic Broadcast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Secaucus, NJ 07094
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Best, Jan
__________________
Jan Crittenden Livingston Panasonic Solutions Company, Product Manager for 3D and Handheld Cameras |
|
May 1st, 2005, 04:48 PM | #7 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
|
negligable speed difference
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|