|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 29th, 2004, 06:25 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 125
|
Panasonic HDV prosumer cam ?
Check out this photo
http://www.geocities.jp/sumi653/P2HD.jpg Is this what I think it is ? A Panna HD cam ? It is part of this web-site http://www.geocities.jp/sumi653/index.html Can anybody provide a translation of the Japanese please ? |
November 29th, 2004, 06:37 AM | #2 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Panasonic is not a member of the HDV Format Consortium, so what they're doing is not HDV. However they probably have their own consumer high-definition thing in the works, who knows. The P2 format that you're referencing here allows for DVCPro HD video recording on removeable flash memory, which is an interesting and welcome step away from tape-based media.
|
November 29th, 2004, 08:49 AM | #3 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
We had heard about this last year or earlier this year. It definitely looks cool, but I'm curious if there gonna market it to HDV users by pricing it sub-$5000.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
November 29th, 2004, 11:48 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
|
if it's really a dvcpro hd(100Mbps) camera, as it's marked on the outside, it will blow the doors off of hdv, if it's sold and priced in a prosumer package.
|
November 29th, 2004, 04:00 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 65
|
Unfortunately, the spec sheet listed the video as Mpeg2.
|
November 29th, 2004, 05:18 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rego Park , NYC
Posts: 665
|
Looks like a Photoshop mock up...
But I guess from everything I've gleaned from the forums...Final Cut Pro already supports this format... Hmmm... |
November 29th, 2004, 08:18 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 414
|
I'm fairly certain it's not a Photoshop markup, I believe they had an actual physical mockup at either NAB or some other major convention and I've seen photos from that...I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I turned up something like that...maybe I saw the pics at camcorderinfo.com... I'm not sure...
My question is, are P2 cards a reasonable recording format for a sub $5K camera? I haven't checked prices lately, but from what I remember about the pricing vs. memory size vs. recording time they were fairly...astronomically priced for a camera in this price range. Unless of course they've come way down since their introduction... |
November 30th, 2004, 12:45 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 572
|
They definitely had a physical mockup...here's the link to more pix and an article...
Panny P2 HD Mockup BTW - As flash memory gets faster and more advanced (which seems like a constantly evolving beast), prices keep dropping. I remember when I first got my flash thumbdrive a little over 1 year ago, I paid something $100+ for 128MB. I just saw a 1GB one on TigerDirect today for like $50. I'm assuming then that regular flash cards have been "evolving" at the same rate as well. Thats' 8X the memory for half the price (or less)! If prices continue to drop rapidly, a P2 system might be viable by the Summer (*Although the expected release date for this model is Fall 2006!). Of course, this doesn't take into account the fact that you may need more than one 16GB card system to be able to shoot more than an hour of footage a day. If Panny was really smart, they'd adapt this thing into a HDD camcorder with a swapable media bay for the Spring, and then push the P2 upgrade the year after. |
December 1st, 2004, 05:12 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 52
|
I think it's not a Photoshop mockup, as it's been seen in reports from the InterBEE fair in Japan.
This picture clearly shows, that there will be TWO models, one MPEG and one DVCPRO-HD. (Isn't DVCPRO-HD 960X720 ??? Or can it do bigger?) http://www.scn-net.ne.jp/~tdcjapan/bee2004/BIG0294.JPG Here's a link to some other photos from interBEE, scroll down to approx. the middle of the page to find the Panasonics: http://www.scn-net.ne.jp/~tdcjapan/bee2004/index.html |
December 1st, 2004, 06:30 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 53
|
I'm not really sure why they would want to do flash media when you can get a 40-60gb laptop harddrive for cheap these days. Do they want us to buy additional flash media? 16gb of flash is huge, but it's nothing in the harddrive world.
|
December 1st, 2004, 08:15 AM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,315
|
Panasonic makes some beautiful HD cameras, and even if they dumb it down for the prosumer level, I'm sure it will be quite a sweet thing. I'm betting they're trying to make a big come-back like they did when they suddenly made 24p the hottest buzzword of the last couple of years, and perhaps something like this is their attempt.
In any case, I think it's funny that they added a handle. Maybe they're trying to woo Super-8 filmmakers? Makes me think of an old Yashica Super-8 I had. |
December 1st, 2004, 08:38 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 572
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Imran Zaidi :
In any case, I think it's funny that they added a handle. Maybe they're trying to woo Super-8 filmmakers? Makes me think of an old Yashica Super-8 I had. -->>> Dude! I am dying for that handle! It's awesome! (shhh [internet whispers]...now don't say anything else that might make Panny remove it) ;) PS - It does inspire youthful dreams of auteurship doesn't it? |
February 15th, 2005, 11:31 PM | #13 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Joonas Kiviharju wrote...
<< This picture clearly shows, that there will be TWO models, one MPEG and one DVCPRO-HD. >> For what it's worth, these appear to be the same two prototype mock-ups that we saw at NAB2004, except in Las Vegas, one was labeled DVCPro HD and the other as DVCPro 50. Maybe there are two different models after all? |
February 16th, 2005, 12:15 AM | #14 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Chris Hurd : Joonas Kiviharju wrote...
<< This picture clearly shows, that there will be TWO models, one MPEG and one DVCPRO-HD. >> For what it's worth, these appear to be the same two prototype mock-ups that we saw at NAB2004, except in Las Vegas, one was labeled DVCPro HD and the other as DVCPro 50. Maybe there are two different models after all? -->>> Jan Crittenden of Panasonic has gone on record as saying that that mockup is not (repeat, not) the camera they're announcing at NAB. |
February 16th, 2005, 08:48 AM | #15 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
This gets more and more interesting.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
| ||||||
|
|