|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 24th, 2008, 11:19 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 65
|
HVX+DVX together
I have a couple of questions as I go through researching a variety of cameras. I've been very interested in the HVX for sometime but I'm leery due to the cost of the P2 cards and such. So my first question is, does anybody have experience using HVX and DVX footage together? How does it flow together? Is the transition between the two noticeable or, despite the differences in the cameras, does the footage blend reasonably well?
My second question is, how many P2 cards would you suggest an event videographer have on hand? I plan on doing a variety of work with this including event videography, a documentary, and some short films among other smaller things. Is it rather quick and easy to get the footage off the P2 card - since it's already in digital format can it be connected to the computer and just copied to your hard drive rather than capturing the footage the traditional way? Thanks guys, I appreciate the input... I may return with more questions. :) |
April 24th, 2008, 11:51 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 48
|
I actually want to add, does the host feature on the HVX transfer quickly? If so, how fast. I'm going to be doing the same kind of work with a HVX and was wondering if just connecting a HDD and doing a transfer could be done in a couple of minutes. The P2 store, P2 cards, and the FS-100 are all ridiculously expensive for what they are. After all a 16GB iPhone is 499 (although they are mass produced making them less expensive per unit etc). I know there are some programers out there that can turn my iPhone into a DVCPRO HD capture device.... make it happen... haha.
I think 2 16GB cards would be good, 40 min per with 720p 24. Most weddings I use about 3, 1 hour tapes per camera for HDV (xh-A1). If your going 1080p then you might need 2 32 GB cards.... or 2 16 GB and do a transfer somewhere in the downtime.... which is why I ask about the host mode. Thanks!!!! |
April 25th, 2008, 08:01 AM | #3 | |
Trustee
|
Funny you ask about P2. I just posted the following a day or so ago in the wedding sub forum. Please remember that the figures I come up with are based on our shooting style. We usually run through 9-10 tapes per wedding.
Quote:
__________________
∅ -Ethan Cooper |
|
April 25th, 2008, 03:56 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 65
|
Great stuff Ethan, thank you! I didn't even know there was a wedding subforum on here :)
What's your opinion on those P2 Store Portable Hard Drive devices for offloading data in the field? Seems like it'd cut down on how often you'd transfer data off of a P2 card cause it holds ~60GB. So if you're talking about having an assistant put the footage onto a laptop they'd be doing about 1/2 as often if they only have to transfer what's on the P2 Store... Anyways, thanks for your reply man! |
April 26th, 2008, 12:40 AM | #5 |
Trustee
|
The P2 store was a nice little guy to have around when card capacities were only 8GB, but now that you can buy a 32GB card, you can only fit one card's worth of data in the thing since it's limited to 60GB and Panasonic never saw fit to increase that.
The good thing about using a laptop in the field is that you can make a redundant backup on the spot. All you need is plenty of space on the internal drive and an external that can power from whatever port you're using. It's not like you can re-shoot the event if your footage is lost, so I'd think a redundant backup for weddings would be essential. That's kinda why I would lean toward having enough cards for the whole day, so I could offload and backup the cards in the comfort of my office but most of us don't have the funds to have a workflow like that.
__________________
∅ -Ethan Cooper |
April 29th, 2008, 10:25 AM | #6 | ||||
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
With a little tweaking in the menus you can get the colors and gamma to match very, very well. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
April 29th, 2008, 10:33 AM | #7 | |||||||
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And, prices keep coming down. When P2 was introduced, it was about $900 per gigabyte. Today, it's about $50 per gigabyte, and about due for a price drop as well. Should be maybe $25 per gigabyte by the end of the year, is my guess. Quote:
Quote:
People don't seem to understand what makes a P2 card different. It's not just some cheap memory stick. First of all, it's made from the premium memory components in existence, "zero defect" memory. Shop around with SD cards and you'll find wildly different price points for varying brands; just like with anything, there's cheap junk and there's premium stuff. Second, the P2 card has a microcomputer inside it to RAID the chips together to make it much faster -- you can stream six streams of HD video off a P2 card (I don't think the iPhone would quite keep up!) Third, and perhaps most importantly, the P2 card has extensive error prevention circuitry in it. Every single byte that gets written to a P2 card gets read back and verified to make sure that it's absolutely fault-free. The card can re-try writing up to six times to make sure that everything gets recorded perfectly. If there's any issue, the card has intelligence in its controller to mark those sectors as unusable and move on. The P2 card is designed around bulletproof ultimate reliability. You're not gonna find that in a cheapo Transcend SD card selling at Wal-Mart. Quote:
|
|||||||
April 29th, 2008, 10:36 AM | #8 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Now, this would mean going to a different media (SD instead of P2) and a different format (AVC-HD instead of DVCPRO-HD) but the cost of recording per minute is dramatically lower. AVC-HD might be the more practical tapeless event shooting scenario. |
|
April 29th, 2008, 10:40 AM | #9 |
Trustee
|
Very true Barry, errr, Mr Green. That's why I have my eye on the 150. Can't wait to hear reports when it hits the streets. I love love love the HVX, but found that P2 (price and size of the cards at the time) just wasn't practical for my style. I have high hopes for the 150. Does the 150 do overcranking?
__________________
∅ -Ethan Cooper |
May 3rd, 2008, 03:34 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 48
|
Thanks for the response Barry, I was joking about the iphone though. =)
I'll have to check but using an external Firewire HDD it really only takes a couple minutes to transfer 16Gb's to my computer. I think like 7 or 8min. I could be wrong though. I remember someone actually making one of those medical tablets into a Firestore like device. Of course he knew how to program, but it cost him like $400 or somthing. As reliable as the Firestore, probably not. It depends on your needs. Regardless, I'm probably getting both a HVX200a and the Firestore becasue the cost per GB is the lowest. $17 per GB with the 100Gb version. Still, they could put bigger HDD's in it. I'm not saying anything about Panasonic because I don't know, but I work in the computer industry and I know about the shenanigans that surround chip manufacturing. Its usually just hype. There's only two or three companies that make chips and then everybody else just rebrands them and puts their "certification" on it and charge a premium. Thanks |
May 7th, 2008, 02:56 PM | #11 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
|
May 7th, 2008, 02:58 PM | #12 | ||
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
May 7th, 2008, 04:53 PM | #13 |
Trustee
|
Ah poo. Oh well, it would have been nice, but I guess they decided to leave that exclusive to the 170 and 200a.
__________________
∅ -Ethan Cooper |
| ||||||
|
|