|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 14th, 2008, 07:10 PM | #31 |
Go Go Godzilla
|
Just to be clear, AVCHD is probably being confused (as it often is) with AVC-Intra. AVCHD is a consumer codec and similar to HDV is long-GOP, although it's supposed to be a slightly more efficient long-GOP. It's not a codec you'd want on a professional camera - AVC-Intra however, is the professional version you do want.
|
February 14th, 2008, 07:57 PM | #32 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Agreed. AVCHD is a theoretical step up from HDV. It's more efficient, offering some combination of smaller files or higher quality. Both are long GOP.
AVC-Intra is a theoretical step up from DVCProHD for similar reasons. Both have fully independent frames. I think a pro can still use AVCHD - just as a pro can currently use HDV. But it's for the bottom tier of the market. And it's not the right solution if you need quick turnaround.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
February 14th, 2008, 09:35 PM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 265
|
dope. sorry, i meant AVC-Intra, which is a step up from the dvc pro HD.
I was hoping for RAW files, but i know good luck |
| ||||||
|
|