|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 30th, 2007, 05:18 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 78
|
Looking for Advice: Which Matte Box
I am looking for a matte box for my HPX500 and Canon lens. I currently have a Zacuto Universal lightweight support system and a Chrosziel follow focus. I mainly want the matte box for light control initially although I will be purchasing some filters in the future. I am debating on the following two:
1. Cavision MB4169H2-M 4x4 Wide Hard Shade Matte Box with Two Metal Filter Trays http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=442170&is=REG or 2. Chrosziel AC41150HPXK1 Mattebox System Kit 1 for HPX-500 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...ystem_Kit.html The Cavision with French Flap and Side Flaps, rod connector and rubber step down ring comes in at around $700. The Chrosziel is about double the price without the side flaps. I could use some advice from some of you who have seen / used / have experience with matte boxes. Thank you in advance. Darrin |
December 30th, 2007, 05:41 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 463
|
#2 without question. Cavision equipment is cheap plastic, and never seems to fit as perfectly as Chrosziel. When it comes to matte boxes, you definitely get what you pay for.
|
December 30th, 2007, 10:30 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
If
Hiya:
I went through this a couple of months ago. The smart money is on the Red Rock Micro new matte box (if it ever ships). For around $500.00, you will have superior quality to the Cavision, a ton of great features and very good quality. Just not sure exactly when they begin deliveries, I think it's within a few weeks for those who had reservations, perhaps a month later for those who didn't. I bought the Cinevate matte box. For a low cost unit, it's pretty great. Two rotating stages, two sizes of french flag and side flags, internal eyebrows, all for $500.00. The quality is quite good, to my eye, better than the more expensive Cavision. It's definitely not Chroiszel quality level but it's about 1/3 the price too. Barry Green has been very positive about the Vocas. He sold his Chroiszel and Cavision (at least I think he had a Cavision) and ended up with the Vocas, which he has been very satisfied with. Lots of good choices. As you know, Zacuto pushes the Petroff boxes so I am sure that they are good as well. But man, that Red Rock seems really sweet for very little $$$ if you can wait. Best, Dan |
December 31st, 2007, 12:04 AM | #4 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
I have looked at the Red Rock and I am on the reservation list but I dont know if it will work well with my camera lens. Since the Red Rock has a swing open arm and there is almost no room on the right side of my lens. (Canon KJ20x8.5) When I look at the Red Rock I see that right side arm getting in the way of the "lens grip" (I dont know what its actually called) On the right side of lens body there is an attached grip that also has controls for zoom, iris, vtr, dip switches, etc.) |
|
December 31st, 2007, 11:13 AM | #5 |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
I'll throw our Vocas imported Century Brand matte boxes into the ring for consideration. Made of the finest quality materials, these are a great choice. Really its either Chrosziel or Century (Vocas) for high quality matte boxes IMO.
http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecomm....aspx?CID=1390 Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
December 31st, 2007, 11:14 AM | #6 |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
Also, check these out for your shiny new matte box which ever way you go. These are the finest low cost filters available today.
http://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecomm....aspx?CID=1431 Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
December 31st, 2007, 11:17 AM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
|
|
December 31st, 2007, 02:56 PM | #8 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
You will be fine if your lens diameters are fairly small. The largest I have is only 58mm and the rubber donuts fit around the lenses perfectly. They do come with several sizes for smaller and larger diameters and one solid that you can cut out for your own custom size. But if you have really large diameter lenses, most of these smaller, lower cost units are not designed to interface with large diameter lenses. Since you have a large diameter broadcast type of lens, not sure on your second question. Go straight to the horse's mouth and contact Brian Valente of Red Rock Micro, he can tell you for sure if it will work. Best, Dan |
|
December 31st, 2007, 02:57 PM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
I already have a circular pola and ND grads but I am interested in ND .06 solid and an ND .09 solid. Do you guys sell an ND .09 solid in this lineup? Dan |
|
December 31st, 2007, 05:44 PM | #10 | |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
Sorry, we just have the ND .6. This set is meant to introduce people to Schneider Quality and for entry level HDV users. While ND.9 is entry level, a set is more likely to be used by more advanced folks such as yourself that know the differences. You can buy the ND.6 though at the stated price. An ND.9 will run you about $40-$60 more at most dealers. I believe both Abel Cine Tech and B&H have these in stock. Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
|
December 31st, 2007, 05:48 PM | #11 | |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
It depends on the camera you have. The one you listed is perfect for the Panasonic HVX200, HPX500, Sony Z1U, etc. If you have a camera with the Sony Toeplate on it then you will need the 0DS-MB44-JHD. Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
|
December 31st, 2007, 05:58 PM | #12 |
Go Go Godzilla
|
I've personally used the Century Optics setup for years; highly recommended especially for the price and because it's made of composite materials it doesn't warp in extreme heat.
There is another consideration, Petroff. Not as easy to get as C.O. or Chroziel but well worth the money and very logically designed. |
January 1st, 2008, 01:17 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 78
|
First off thank you to everyone for the great advice and info. I have been "playing" with video for many years and have had a lot of cameras but this is my first matte box purchase.
Whatever I decide to go with - any problems with keeping the matte box on camera at all times? I use a Pelican hard case so the lens is basically protected I am just wondering since I have always kept my lenses fully enclosed on all of the cameras I have had over the years with the original sunshade and cover. Thanks again. I am pretty sure I will either get the Chrosziel 41150 or the Century Optics DVMB. Darrin |
January 1st, 2008, 11:17 AM | #14 | |
Go Go Godzilla
|
Quote:
Most people who are using MB's on fixed-lens cameras always leave the MB on the rails because there's no reason to remove it, and in fact Zacuto makes inserts for Pelican and other cases so that you can custom-fit the camera, rails and other hardware to just drop-in the case with MB attached. If you were using a removable lens system then yes, the MB would always be removed because you wouldn't want to transport the camera with lens attached. |
|
January 1st, 2008, 01:58 PM | #15 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Would you say I am looking for trouble by transporting camera with lens attached? Darrin |
|
| ||||||
|
|