|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 7th, 2007, 01:42 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Posts: 36
|
Apples to Apples?
Ok...so I am ashamed that admit that I have waited and eternity to jump on the bandwagon of HD shooting. I am desperately trying to catch up with all the info out there and purchase a camera within in a week or so. It is truly humbling. My comfort zone? I have been shooting with a DVX100 for so long...I am sad to just drop it. I hear the HVX200 is the way to go if you shoot with a DVX100.
My question is this. Everywhere I look, I see that the other HDV cameras shoot high-definition 1920x1080 resolution images while recording to inexpensive miniDV tapes. Now HDV uses higher compression so I hear that the image quality can suffer. So what about the HVX200? When it shoots to a P2 card does it shoot uncompressed? If it doesn't shoot uncompressed, how does it stack up to HDV's compression? I realize that this subject might have already been butchered to death...anyone can point me out to another post that touches on this subject? Thanks |
October 7th, 2007, 03:55 PM | #2 | ||||||
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
October 7th, 2007, 07:38 PM | #3 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Posts: 36
|
Chris:
Thanks a million for the response...It is incredibly valuable to me. One question though...when you say" Quote:
|
|
October 8th, 2007, 10:09 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 490
|
25 megabits per seconds is 4 times as compressed as 10 megabits per second.
Also, DVCPRO HD records twice as much color information, and doesn’t suffer from the MPEG motion artifacts that some have witnessed in footage from some HDV cameras. |
| ||||||
|
|