|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 11th, 2013, 03:38 PM | #46 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
If the GH3 had peaking, you could judge focus. Case in point it doesn't matter how great the IQ is if the ergonomics cause you to bring home lots of blurry footage or fail to bring home footage at all from missed shots.
|
August 11th, 2013, 03:43 PM | #47 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
If you got $600 or more and feel the need to impress other camera guys, then buy the name brand. You can build a nice looking one for less than $40 and get the same results. True for DIY sliders and jibs. You can make one look just as good. Doesn't have to look like plumbing. LOL Heck, paint a name brand on a DIY and fool everyone. I am not into ever trying to impress anyone with gear or name brands. I have always let my work and the look/sound sell my clients and none have ever complained. I am also talking here about my high end clients. Paint it black and no one even cares. :-) Alex |
|
August 11th, 2013, 03:43 PM | #48 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Peaking is no holy grail either, it can be of help but depending on the situation it's not always 100% accurate, If it's too dark it won't help either. I have focus peaking on my ea50 but don't us it at weddings, I rather use my own eyes to judge focus.
|
August 11th, 2013, 03:48 PM | #49 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Dream on, a steadicam is a precission tool that requires precission and high quality hardware and manufacturing. If you can't afford one, then sure get a 40 dollar one or build one yourself, if you are serious about results, get the real deal and pay for it.
|
August 11th, 2013, 04:01 PM | #50 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Romania
Posts: 201
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
I don't know man, I've seen DIY steadicams work extremely well. I saw a vid of a guy running down a pretty steep hill with his own DIY rig and it was unbelievably smooth :-/ it's just that I'm horrible at manual labor and generally at building things, so I don't know if this is a valid solution for me...
|
August 11th, 2013, 04:04 PM | #51 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
[QUOTE ..., from what I have read the merlin is not so easy to balance so maybe something to take into consideration.[/QUOTE]
Noa, I forgot to mention that I heard just the opposite about fine tuning the Merlin and the Gllidecams. There is a guy named Dave on YouTube, very well known for having better reeviews than most, and he has personally owned and used the Glidecam and he said he never did get it tuned good after days of trying. He said that other brands were much easier. I have heard this before. So, who knows unless you try them all and then even people can still have different opinions. Alex |
August 11th, 2013, 04:05 PM | #52 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
When you ever get to build one, put a 50mm lens on the gh3 and show me some moves and I will do the same with the blackbird, you"ll understand why the better ones cost more. :) |
|
August 11th, 2013, 04:08 PM | #53 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
|
August 11th, 2013, 04:35 PM | #54 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 304
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
It's the audio meters disappearing that are annoying. Peaking would definitely make this a better camera as well. |
|
August 11th, 2013, 04:35 PM | #55 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
no, he did not use a fisheye. he has more experience than assuming that. I have heard good things about the blackbird, too. Watch over 50 youtubes and see how some are really good. And I would not use a 50mm. It's OK, but wider is better. It makes things even more steady and it keeps everything in focus since you can't be fiddling with focus while walking and running around.
We are only talking here about a few bars that hold weights in strategic places to counter act the movement of the camera. It's not rocket science. I saw one guy online that had access to some really nice machine tools and he built a Merlin 2 copy that worked and look perfect. Alex Last edited by Alex Anderson; August 11th, 2013 at 05:34 PM. |
August 11th, 2013, 04:37 PM | #56 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
Alex Last edited by Alex Anderson; August 11th, 2013 at 05:36 PM. |
|
August 11th, 2013, 04:44 PM | #57 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
This Steadicam =
Amazon.com: Steadicam SMOOTHEE-GPROHRO Smoothee with GoPro Mount and Belt Clip: Camera & Photo would be perfect for my Canon EOS-M and it's 22mm f2.0. Alex Last edited by Alex Anderson; August 11th, 2013 at 05:35 PM. |
August 11th, 2013, 04:55 PM | #58 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
alex |
|
August 11th, 2013, 05:39 PM | #59 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 261
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
Alex |
|
August 11th, 2013, 05:55 PM | #60 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Re: gh3... any typical problems?
Quote:
And it has undesirable side effects such as the record button having to be pressed twice if the overlays are off, once it they are on. Panasonic should not be given a pass on these things. |
|
| ||||||
|
|