|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 26th, 2013, 06:12 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 366
|
X900/920 EVF Compared to TM700?
I'm looking to upgrade my aging TM700, but would like something with a better EVF. The TM700 EVF is barely usable for framing. For those who've already upgraded, have you found the X900/920 EVF an improvement?
Many Thanks, Dan
__________________
Dan Carter: HDC-TM700, DMC-GH2 and DMC-GH3, Sony RX100II and RX10, Final Cut Pro X http://www.vimeo.com/user582748 Last edited by Dan Carter; June 27th, 2013 at 12:38 PM. |
|
|
|
July 10th, 2013, 11:27 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 366
|
Re: X900/920 EVF Compared to TM700
Found a bit of info on these EVFs:
TM700: 123K X920: 263K Technically, the X920 should be an improvement.
__________________
Dan Carter: HDC-TM700, DMC-GH2 and DMC-GH3, Sony RX100II and RX10, Final Cut Pro X http://www.vimeo.com/user582748 |
|
|
|
|
July 11th, 2013, 01:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 140
|
Re: X900/920 EVF Compared to TM700
Hi Dan, I just bought the X-920 and I have the TM700 there is a difference, the best way I can describe it is like this, the TM700 EVF is like going closer to your T.V. screen until you see the pixels that start making up the pictures, so you can see the dots (like news print) you can verify that by looking through your EVF, the X-920 you don't see the pixels it's smoother and sharper looking.
|
|
|
|
|
July 11th, 2013, 05:29 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 366
|
Re: X900/920 EVF Compared to TM700
Thank you for the review Norman. This is helpful.
I hope your new X920 is a success...
__________________
Dan Carter: HDC-TM700, DMC-GH2 and DMC-GH3, Sony RX100II and RX10, Final Cut Pro X http://www.vimeo.com/user582748 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
