June 28th, 2012, 04:23 PM | #736 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 793
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
1. More misleading, I think
2. A lens with a wide aperture, f2.8 or lower, preferably f1.8 or f1.4
__________________
Colin |
June 28th, 2012, 04:26 PM | #737 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Romania
Posts: 201
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Ok, gotcha, thank you :)
|
June 30th, 2012, 03:29 AM | #738 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Helsinge Denmark
Posts: 12
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Quote:
"Roll on the day when we might be able to put 1080P/50 or 60 on Blu ray" I have authored all my Panasonic HDC-SD700 1080P/50 HD footage since 2010 to Blu-ray using the free MultiAVCHD. |
|
July 5th, 2012, 06:29 AM | #739 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stocksfield, England
Posts: 86
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
"I have authored all my Panasonic HDC-SD700 1080P/50 HD footage since 2010
to Blu-ray using the free MultiAVCHD." Hi, are such discs playable on most BD players or just certain ones?
__________________
Claire |
July 5th, 2012, 09:21 AM | #740 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Helsinge Denmark
Posts: 12
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Hi,
You can use multiAVCHD to author 1080 50p/60p blu-ray disc with full Menus & Chapters. Newer 3D Blu-ray players now support “AVCHD V2.0” which now includes 1920x1080 @ 50P or 60P My Sony PS3 and Samsung BD-C6900 plays MultiAVCHD authored 1080/50p Blu-ray discs without any problems. |
July 5th, 2012, 12:29 PM | #741 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Romania
Posts: 201
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
A bit of an off-topic question: how do you guys CLEAN your TM900? Especially the lens. I tried using cotton swabs, but felt as if there are more efficient ways of doing it... had to apply pressure to get the dust particles off the lens, hopefully I didn't scratch it... thank you!
|
July 5th, 2012, 03:31 PM | #742 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 793
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Impregnated lens/LCD cleaning tissue, followed by dry lens cleaning cloth. Dont worry about scratching the lens, modern day lens coatings are very tough. If my normal cleaning cloths are not to hand, a breath on the lens and buff with a clean handkerchief more than suffices
__________________
Colin |
July 6th, 2012, 07:32 AM | #743 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Romania
Posts: 201
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Thank you Colin, was actually worried about scratches, so good to know that.
|
July 7th, 2012, 08:20 PM | #744 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 456
|
HDMI out to uncompressed capture? Anyone doing it?
In seeing my footage in HDMI out to my monitor, it is clearly superior to what I am getting from the AVCHD format I'm putting into my NLE from this camera. Is anyone trying to capture this stuff uncompressed directly from the camera? Or even running the captured footage out the HDMI port into something like a Matrox device to capture it uncompressed that way? If I can get the uncompressed footage like what I'm seeing on my 48" home monitor through HDMI, I'd be thrilled. Seems it could easily then match the 4:2:2 I'm getting out of my Canon XF305.
It appears from the fact that if I capture it in camera (before writing to the SD card), that I'm getting the uncompressed footage going out the HDMI port prior to conversion to AVCHD. Or am I wrong? Is AVCHD going directly to HDMI really that high quality? Putting this same footage into my NLE as AVCHD destroys so much of the latitude, and I can't get it back no matter what I do in rendering. I assume that's what the Matrox and other boxes will do for me. But will they work with this camera?
__________________
Al Upper left hand corner of the map |
July 7th, 2012, 09:03 PM | #745 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 420
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
"It appears from the fact that if I capture it in camera (before writing to the SD card), that I'm getting the uncompressed footage going out the HDMI port prior to conversion to AVCHD. Or am I wrong?"
I believe that you're right, I mean, not wrong. I am also very curious about this. If anyone is capturing to a Ninja or nanoFlash or whatever please share your results. TIA
__________________
http://www.markoconnell.org |
July 8th, 2012, 06:43 AM | #746 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 626
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Hi Mark,
I tried unsuccessfully to use a nanoFlash with the TM 900 set at 1080p50. When I asked Convergent Design about the problem I was told that "there was too much information" for thenF to process. For further information I would suggest asking your question on the Convergent Design site. |
July 8th, 2012, 09:24 AM | #747 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stocksfield, England
Posts: 86
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Assuming you are using full quality 50/60P mode while viewing live output and the same for the recording, how did you manage to compare them? I don't see an easy way to do this, not without a studio, consistent lighting and preferably a monitor with built in scopes.
I did this test with my EX1R but that was easy, I used SDI out into Edius via my Storm 3G card. The 3G card has HDMI output to my HDTV and I have live scopes in Edius. Personally I don't recall observing any difference between live and recordings using my TM900 but then I have to rely on memory as I switch between the two and with the time gap the light changes, it's simply not the same as instant switch overs.
__________________
Claire |
July 9th, 2012, 01:45 PM | #748 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Authoring AVCHD 2.0 onto Blu-ray media that play only on AVCHD 2.0 supported Blu-ray players is not the same as authoring actual 1080/50p/60p compliant Blu-ray disks. The latter do not exist. It's a step in the right direction, but some Blu-ray players have discontinued AVCHD 2.0 suppport and some that had it have even rolled back to unsupport it with firmware "upgrades," Oppo being noted for this.
|
July 10th, 2012, 09:22 AM | #749 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grosse Pointe, Mich
Posts: 21
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
I've been using the TM900 for almost a year, and still quite impressed at how well it has done. Tomorrow I should receive the new HM-X900M. Can't wait to see the differences.
|
July 17th, 2012, 06:34 AM | #750 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grosse Pointe, Mich
Posts: 21
|
Re: The Panasonic TM900 Users Thread
Did I kill this thread or something?
Anyway, the new has some differences in operation, but performs very well. |
| ||||||
|
|