|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 7th, 2003, 03:33 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 804
|
Tom,
One of the divisions of the company I work for commerializes professional gear for editing photo's, magzines...It's a pleasure to see how commercial leaflets can be manipulated... It can't be Nikon's purpose to convince (mislead) people that focal length plays a role in the above cases. The only thing that can happen is that some misinformed salespeople, "invented" this tale and the pictures. |
March 7th, 2003, 07:44 PM | #17 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
|
Shallow DOF
|
March 7th, 2003, 08:40 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Northridge Ca
Posts: 734
|
Re: Shallow DOF
<<<-- Originally posted by Juan Trujillo : Isn't this shallow depth of field?
http://www.24p.com/downloads/11B.jpg -->>> It is, but not in any practical sense. It's full tight, wide aperature, maybe 1 foot horizontal field of view, and the background is probably twenty feet away (the blurry background in the upper left). The camera is maybe six feet from the subject. Great for shooting insects and leaves, but pretty hard to shoot a movie this way. Try duplicating this look on a head and shoulders shot in an interior setting.
__________________
Wayne If it was easy, they'd get a relative to do it. |
March 7th, 2003, 09:19 PM | #19 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
A different set of rules apply to macro photography and DOF. In some case (because of the greater image magnification) video will have less DOF than film in close up photography.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
| ||||||
|
|