August 26th, 2004, 12:51 PM | #196 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 621
|
Joe, I paid about that much for my DVC80 a little over a year ago and it was worth every penny. Still is. Comparing used to new prices is a little unfair, as well.
As of today, it's still there at B&H and I'd definitely recommend it. |
August 31st, 2004, 03:34 PM | #197 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF, Ca
Posts: 421
|
It's worth about 1900.00
|
August 31st, 2004, 05:34 PM | #198 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 621
|
How do you figure that, Michael?
At the very least, it's as good as a VX2100, which is more than $1900. At best, it was nearly a PD150/170 competitor, and was bought (and considered) as such by some broadcast news professionals. I'm not trying to start an argument here; it just sounds like you're making a pretty arbitrary statement. (and I'm comparing new to new. If a new DVX100a costs $3400, then I'd say that the same camera without 24p/30p is worth $1000 less. And a new DVC80 was a huge savings over a new PD150. A *used* DVC80 probably is worth about $1900) |
August 31st, 2004, 07:38 PM | #199 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mankato, Minnesota
Posts: 104
|
Any way you look at it, the DVC80 is a great camera. If I didn't own a DVX, I'd probably own that.
__________________
http://www.horsefilms.com "I like Mankato just a little bit better than any other town in the world." -Sinclair Lewis |
August 31st, 2004, 09:28 PM | #200 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
I can't remember the exact price but B&H had the DVC80 for much less (perhaps right at $2000) before they last went out of stock.
For $2699 you can get the PD170 from B&H using the WEVA discount and mail-in rebate. |
September 4th, 2004, 07:24 PM | #201 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Victorville, California
Posts: 30
|
Seems B&H is trying to capitilize on a great camera no longer being in production by upping the price. They used to selll it for $2,199 when it was still being made and I got mine for less than $2,000 from BuyDig.
Yes, I had to endure the high pressure sales tactics they use to try and get me to purchase more equipment but when I threatened to cancel the sale if he didn't trust my judgement he backed off and sold it for the web advertised price of $1,899 with full US Warranty. It is a great camera, it's just a shame B&H seems to be stooping to price gouging. |
September 4th, 2004, 07:37 PM | #202 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
BuyDig is Not an authorized Panasonic dealer -- U.S. customers will lose your warranty going through that high-pressure outfit. There's a big thread on dvxuser about this; Jan C. from Panasonic has verified who is or is not an authorized U.S. dealer.
B&H charges a fair price, plus they're a DV Info Net sponsor. Buy from them and you're helping this community to continue being the great free resource that it is. Thanks, |
September 9th, 2004, 10:06 PM | #203 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Victorville, California
Posts: 30
|
Dear Chris;
Sorry to get you so upset and I hope I did not send people to the wrong source. It was my mistake. I DID NOT purchase my DVC-80 from Buy Dig. It was in fact ProFeel for the above mentioned price. I got them confused as I had called so many places trying to find a good price. And I do appreciate B&H being a sponsor for this site but I don't think that should excuse them to jack up prices beyond what they originally listed the item for new. |
September 10th, 2004, 06:52 AM | #204 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 621
|
But Aaron, as I stated above, I paid approx. $2400 for a DVC80 from B&H over a year ago -- at the time, that was the "reasonable" street price (yes, some online retailers had it for less, as always; and list price was around $2900, I believe) and it was still around $1000 less than the DVX100.
It maintained this price for a bit even after my purchase. Yes, the price dropped before the camera was discontinued, but it somewhat misleading to say that B&H has "jack[ed] up prices beyond what they originally listed the item for new." I'd say that they are selling the camera at a median price that it not only *originally sold for*, but which is also just about right between the original list price and the very final price it sold for before discontinuation. Considering that a new DVC80 is now a rare thing, I'd call that a reasonable price |
September 10th, 2004, 07:42 PM | #205 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Victorville, California
Posts: 30
|
Sorry to mislead anyone. I just thought I remembered it being cheaper ($2,200?) than the first guy said. I could be wrong, I do remember not purchasing it through B&H because the price was higher than I was seeing it from other reputable dealers.
So, sorry if my memory's a little fuzzy. Frankly cost was an issue for me so I checked into a lot of places before purchase but I just don't remember it being that high. That said, you are right, it's a great camera and around the same price I remember it as so I don't mean to paint B&H in a negative light. Sorry:( |
September 20th, 2004, 05:24 PM | #206 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 54
|
I bough mine from them maybe 3 weeks ago they had 2 only..I got one ....
|
September 20th, 2004, 07:22 PM | #207 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 60
|
Bought mine in Feb for $2100 from B&H with a $100.00 gift certificate.
DJ |
September 22nd, 2004, 02:40 PM | #208 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 129
|
CineGamma in DVC80?
I understand that the DVC80 does not do progressive, and also does not have CineSwitch, but does it have CineGamma (like the DVC30)? I thought it did, but can't find anything saying anything either way.
Also, they say that the DVC80 is the exact same camera as the DVC100, but minus the progressive, CineSwitch, & maybe CineGamma. IS that exactly true? IOW do they both use the same CCDs? If so, that would mean that the DVC80 would be theoretically progressive capable, but the firmware just cripples that feature. Thanks, Alex F |
September 22nd, 2004, 05:46 PM | #209 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 621
|
The DVC80 does not have CineGamma (as well as the other things you mentioned it not having). It also does not have some of the nicities of the DVX100, like the focal meter and the user-controllable audio gain control.
I believe the rest of the hardware is the same -- lens, CCDs, and whatnot. I don't think that means that making it progressive would be very easy (or even possible). I honestly think that if it was possible, someone would have done it by now (and someone would have posted the instructions here at dvinfo.net). As I've said before, the DVC80 is a great camera as it is. It's somewhere between the VX2000 and the PD150 (and some think that it's the equal of the PD150). If you want progressive, get a progressive cam; but the DVC80 is a great cam regardless. (and, as always, you can see the DVC80 in action on my site at http://www.karatemedia.com/video and http://www.karatemedia.com/video/nonsense.html -- not the best stuff in the world, but I love pimpin' myself...) |
September 22nd, 2004, 09:15 PM | #210 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 129
|
How then, does the 80 compare to the dvc30? I kn ow that the 30 has smaller CCDs, and that it does have CineGamma (how well does that even work?). But what are the other differences between the two?
Thanks, Alex F |
| ||||||
|
|