|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 16th, 2015, 06:17 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 425
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
What does it matter what it looks like? The image quality and how easy (or not) it is to use are the important things. If you don't like the colour, buy a cover or get your paint-brush out! ;-)
__________________
Steam Age Pictures - videos in aid of railway preservation societies. |
April 16th, 2015, 04:26 PM | #17 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
Quote:
No way it's 4:4:4. It's 8bit 4:2:0 internal. If only Blackmagic made a HDMI 2.0 Hyperdeck Shuttle, but alas, only the 12G Hyperdeck can capture 4:2:2 from this camera. |
|
April 16th, 2015, 07:37 PM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
I did see the other videos before I posted that and I'll still be hoping it'll get at the very least 10 bit and 422. If not than I can easily see this camera being priced anywhere from $4,000 to $4,500 if all it's able to do internally is 8 bit and 420.
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/user/PhotoVi...esEtc/featured https://www.pond5.com/artist/paulot Last edited by Paulo Teixeira; April 16th, 2015 at 09:16 PM. |
April 16th, 2015, 07:48 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 211
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
So what would be the depth of field different between this and my AC-160? Is there any way to know this without using the camera?
__________________
Jonathan Schwartz CA Video Productions |
April 17th, 2015, 11:28 AM | #20 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
The New Camera is based on MIcro 4/3rd sensor so it is much bigger than the AG 160 1/3 inch sensor so the DVX200 should have much less depth of field
|
April 17th, 2015, 05:03 PM | #21 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,222
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
Quote:
Ron Evans |
|
April 17th, 2015, 05:38 PM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,773
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
That's what I've been afraid of since day one. Heck, I'd settle for 8 bit and 4:2:2.
Still, if it does end up being only 8 bit and 4:2:0 than I'm expecting the price to be around $4,000 and up to $4,500 max. |
April 18th, 2015, 12:18 AM | #23 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
i wonder how fast is the lens, f1,6, constant, faster?
__________________
I love this place! |
April 18th, 2015, 01:04 AM | #24 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
The press release listed it at F2.8-F4.5, which on a large sensor is slightly better than your typical F3.5-F5.6 lenses. It is very likely de-clicked already since the iris is designed for video.
|
April 18th, 2015, 06:54 AM | #25 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
I want to go on record and say that I dislike shooting with lenses that have ramping iris ranges of this magnitude. Defeats the purpose of the zoom in certain situations. If you expose for the long end of the lens and then use the wide you have to readjust the iris. If you are using the wide part of the lens and then zoom in you often end up with underexposed footage.
|
April 18th, 2015, 07:38 AM | #26 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
I guess the ramping comes down to how large a lens you want on the camera. There will be a few trade offs going on regarding the size of a fixed lens hand held camera like this, especially with larger sensors.
|
April 18th, 2015, 07:54 AM | #27 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,222
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
Quote:
Ron Evans |
|
April 18th, 2015, 09:27 AM | #28 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
Well, DVX 100 was f1,6 constant, 2,8 - 4,5 - sucks big time,
probably will go Ursa mini, i shoot two cameras all the time anyways.
__________________
I love this place! |
April 18th, 2015, 10:49 AM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 254
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
Buba,
The DVX 100A is f/1.6 to 2.8 or 3.4 at the 10x end of the zoom. Ken |
April 18th, 2015, 07:02 PM | #30 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Re: Panasonic 4K DVX200
Plus of course, you'd probably double the cost of the camera, leaving people something worse to complain about. :)
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
| ||||||
|
|