|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 2nd, 2004, 03:24 AM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
DVX and gain up controls
okies, now most Pana cams have gain up from +6, +9 +12 +15 and +18
the DVX lets me mess around with 6, 9 12 and 18 .. but what about 15?? Obviously, 15+ would offer a higher gain than 12 but it would also carry lower noise artefacts than +18... so why cant we get to it??Why cant we use it?? i mean there've been countless times when all i needed was that tiny boost, but jumping to 18 was too noisy, so then im left with using a light which i dont particularly want to use.. especially for weddings... any ideas?? thoughts?? Opinions on this? |
April 7th, 2004, 09:37 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,315
|
I think most people tend to avoid using gain like the plague. I know for myself, it's pretty much a non-issue. If I can't shoot it without using gain, then I try my best to avoid it altogether, or light it, or use a reflector, or something - anything to avoid gain.
|
April 7th, 2004, 02:27 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 38
|
Interesting. I feel like anything over 6db of gain looks terrible--period. If you need to boost the gain by 15db I'd say you need a better lighting solution. How about a nice on-camera light with a dimmer and small softbox?
Think of it this way: the DVX100 is nominally rated at an ISO of 640. +15 db is the equivalent of 2.5 extra stops of light. If you were a still photog, you'd be using ISO 3200 film! It's going to be grainy/noisy, with film or a digicam or a video camera. |
April 8th, 2004, 02:16 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
"I'd say you need a better lighting solution. How about a nice on-camera light with a dimmer and small softbox?"
:) got those!!! I dont knw about the NTSC models, but i can safely say that i frequenty run the gain up at +12 without any noticable artefacts.. when i hit, +18 i get those blue pixles in my blacks.. mind you im using cine gamma and matrix is set to cinema.. so it IS darker than most other settings.... |
April 8th, 2004, 02:28 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 38
|
Well, the PAL model must also include nitrogen-cooled CCD's :-). It sounds like you're trying to be very low-key at the wedding--which is good, but maybe you can crank your light up a little more. Folks look their best at an event like a wedding and I don't think they're going to mind a bit of light while you're shooting.
Why did Pany skip +15db? Maybe the software engineer had a hangover that day. Maybe it was Friday afternoon and he said, "Four o'clock and I'm only up to +12db? I'm adding +18 db and then I'm off for a relaxing time and some Suntory whisky!" |
April 11th, 2004, 08:38 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
LOL@Barry.. that WOULD NOT surprise me mate.. hahahaha
at the moment, im running 10w globes, which are fine enough for up to 7 metres.. i thought about going higher maybe 20 or 35, (i used to use 100w... ) but its not the best when your going around to tables and people are sqinting at you during an interview.. with the 10w globe and fitted diffuser, i dont get any squints.. i think this is probably as high a globe i wnat to get near peoples faces.. id love to go higher.. but for my work.. it just doesnt cut it.. :( |
| ||||||
|
|