|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 4th, 2003, 06:46 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 745
|
Progressive video!
Hello.
I am just now beginning to take the dvx100 seriously as next cam. Sorry I'm late, Teach', I'll catch up, promise :-). I've been reading and I have a basic question. 24p and 30p and progressive in general yield better resolution and fewer image problems, ("artifacts", "combed" edges, etc.) than interlaced, yes or no? If this is the case, then I can understand the attraction to this camera with wide open eyes, film look completely aside. Progressive sounds like exactly the sort of improvement video on the whole could use. No doubt this has been covered here innumerable times, but I wasn't sure how to search for so specific a thing. Will try again. Thanks, regards, Shawn
__________________
Breakthrough In Grey Room |
October 5th, 2003, 11:01 AM | #2 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
It does indeed. Steve Mullen wrote an article in Video Systems describing his ideas on this (very detailed - the link is off Terrence's DVX100 page) and Adam Wilt has some information on this as well.
The improved resolution from progressive is most evident on shots with motion. |
October 5th, 2003, 05:51 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 745
|
Began reading Mullen's article almost immediately after posting this. Thank you, Stephen. This, I would venture to say, is the real revolution behind the 24p mania.
Regards, Shawn
__________________
Breakthrough In Grey Room |
| ||||||
|
|