|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 1st, 2008, 01:09 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 13
|
30P in DVX100B & DVC30 look different
I use the DVC30 for a back-up cam to aid the DVX for my wedding ceremonies etc. I have come to notice that the 30P footage of the DVC30 actually looks better than the DVX, any truth to this? Why would this be if true? I have matched both cams (via settings, etc.) as closely as possible; several settings are not available on the DVC30.
I am finding that the DVC30 images look even more film-like than the DVX's. Any info will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
February 1st, 2008, 01:46 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep South, U.S.
Posts: 1,526
|
Hi Scott,
I haven't used the DVX100 much but am one of the first DVC30 owners in the US. I can attest to its SD 4:3 image quality. I have played DVDs I shot on the DVC30 on a 40 inch LCD TV and it holds up pretty good. For some reason it never was a popular cam. I hear now that it is no longer manufactered.
__________________
Mark videos: http://vimeo.com/channels/3523 Stock: http://www.pond5.com/artist/mark29 |
February 1st, 2008, 01:51 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 13
|
Thanks Mark for the reply. I really like mine; as I said it is a back-up for my DVX100 and I also use it for my Outdoor Media Shoots etc.; its 16x lens & low light capabilities come in handy!
|
April 10th, 2008, 02:34 PM | #4 |
Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3
|
I really like my DVC30 too. I use it solely for weddings and some school videos. The quality is really great.
__________________
www.BrunProductions.com |
April 23rd, 2008, 11:15 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 204
|
I agree, the DVC30 is a stronger 60i sports and wildlife camera due to the lens, I disagree on the 30p shooting.
The 30 uses field some flavor of field doubling to pull off it's progressive mode, resulting in (as I recall) something like 40% lower resolution than a 100. I find they can match up color wise quite well, but he sharpness and detail just isnt there when trying to cut them together. That being said- my 30 made me a ton of money in its lifetime. When shooting 60i no one knew it wasnt a 100. |
| ||||||
|
|