|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 3rd, 2003, 05:17 PM | #16 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Jared:
Stuart English is the VP at Panasonic Broadcast - so I'm pretty sure his word on this is final. |
June 3rd, 2003, 05:26 PM | #17 |
DVX User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 281
|
thank steve... Good to actually hear from the boss :)
|
June 4th, 2003, 08:58 AM | #18 |
RED Workflow Wizard
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, Ca
Posts: 112
|
DVC80 and DVX100
Chris asked me to posta short note on the main differences between the AG-DVC80 and AG-DVX100 cameras.
First what's the same (identical) Chassis (Mag Alloy) XLR and audio circuits Microphone(s) Lens (Leica) Tape transport LCD and Viewfinder IEEE 1394 for NLE / dub CCD pixel count What's different CCD output mode (interlace only - no 24P or 30P) DSP functionality ( more limited operational range) IEEE 1394 parallel back up to external VTR (none) Time-Lapse (none) There are other differences, but basicly the DVX100 is a "production" camera, and the DVC80 a "news" camera. Of course in this category of product there is a lot of cross over between applications a camera may be designed for and what it is used for, but these are the main points. Even if you only ever shoot 480 line interlace, the DVX100 may still be the camera for you to buy for the DSP advantages and additional timelapse and IEEE 1394 feature set. The web site at www.panasonic.com/broadcast will have complete spec sheets. A final note. The DVC80 brochure makes more of the Mag Alloy chassis, because it was written later. i.e the rumor of "plastic" needed rebutting, so the MA chassis was emphasized. But it is identical in both products. Hope that this helps, Stuart English V.P Marketing Panasonic Broadcast |
June 4th, 2003, 09:11 AM | #19 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
That does help - thanks so much for taking the time to give us the official details.
|
June 4th, 2003, 09:12 AM | #20 |
DVX User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 281
|
ok stuart, while you are at it can you clarify this caption in the DVC-80 brochure? You might want to correct the brochure before some people get even more confused, and lawyers happy :)
.... Developed specifically for the AG-DVC80, the DV mechanism itself is far more advanced and reliable than those used in home DV cameras and recorders. Its sturdy loading system allows quick tape changes. And to minimize dropout and head..... |
June 4th, 2003, 09:14 AM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Prospect, IL
Posts: 67
|
Could you elaborate on the DSP differences that you mention.
Thanks Carl |
June 4th, 2003, 09:15 AM | #22 |
DVX User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 281
|
Cinne-Gamma is a DSP :)
|
June 4th, 2003, 09:15 AM | #23 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Jared:
Just consider the DVC-80 and DVX100 as the same camera with different electronics. The single body was developed at the same time for both variations. You'll find a nearly identical phrase in the DVX100 brochure. |
June 4th, 2003, 09:19 AM | #24 |
DVX User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 281
|
lol I am totally on track with you Steve, I just heard different things from different people at Panasonic, and then the Specifications on print material, lol
Stuart was right on the money showing the differences as I mentioned earlier though, everyone a tPanasonic told me that the DVX100 is a "production" camera, and the DVC80 a "news" camera, and that they boasted about it in the flyer for the dvc80 because of the pastic rumours. |
June 4th, 2003, 09:19 AM | #25 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Carl:
The DSP differences are mostly related to progressive scan. Those are removed from the DVC-80. The only was to get a comprehensive list would be to download both cams manuals and compare menu functions. |
| ||||||
|
|